Suppr超能文献

老年创伤后髋部骨折的疼痛治疗:区域阻滞与全身性非甾体类镇痛药的比较

Pain treatment in post-traumatic hip fracture in the elderly: regional block vs. systemic non-steroidal analgesics.

作者信息

Godoy Monzón Daniel, Vazquez Jorge, Jauregui José R, Iserson Kenneth V

出版信息

Int J Emerg Med. 2010 Nov 6;3(4):321-5. doi: 10.1007/s12245-010-0234-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective, randomized double-blind study, conducted over 19 months in a tertiary care ED, sought to determine if a fascia-iliaca regional anesthetic block provides better and safer pain relief than does parenteral analgesia.

AIMS

This study also aimed to determine the effectiveness of parenteral NSAID analgesia for acute hip fractures.

METHODS

Patients >65 years old presenting at an adult ED with acute hip fractures were randomized upon presentation to the ED into two groups (A and B) using numbers generated by the EPI-INFO™ (Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) program. The randomization list was kept by one of the authors who did not interact with the patients. Two groups of patients were to receive either (A) a fascia-iliaca block with bupivacaine and parenteral saline injection, or (B) the same block with saline and an IV NSAID injection. Upon admission to the study, vital signs such as blood pressure, mean blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and pain-intensity measurements [using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] were obtained and repeated at 15 min, 2 h and at8 h. The occurrence of complications was registered.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-five patients were randomized, and 21 were excluded from participation. The remaining 154 patients were grouped as: group A (n = 62) or group B (n = 92). The mean pain level on admission to the ED for all patients, assessed with the VAS, was 8.21 ± 0.91 (CI 95%: 6.43-9.99); in group A the VAS was 7.6 ± 0.22 and in group B 8.5 ± 0.72 (p = 0.411). At 15-min evaluation, values were: group A 6.24 ± 0.17 and group B 2.9 ± 0.16 (p < 0.001). At the 2-h assessment, values were: group A 1.78 ± 0.11 and group B 2.3 ± 1.16 (p = 0.764). At 8 h the VAS for group A was 2.03 ± 0.12 and for group B 4.4 ± 0.91 (p = 0.083).

CONCLUSION

THIS STUDY DEMONSTRATES THAT: (1) parenteral NSAIDs are very effective as analgesics after hip fractures in elderly patients, (2) fascia-iliaca regional blocks are nearly as effective for up to about 8 h after administration and (3) regional fascia-iliaca blocks effectively control post-hip fracture pain. (4) Fascia iliaca regional block has a rapid onset.

摘要

背景

这项前瞻性、随机双盲研究在一家三级护理急诊科进行,为期19个月,旨在确定筋膜髂骨区域麻醉阻滞是否比胃肠外镇痛提供更好、更安全的疼痛缓解效果。

目的

本研究还旨在确定胃肠外非甾体抗炎药镇痛对急性髋部骨折的有效性。

方法

年龄大于65岁、因急性髋部骨折就诊于成人急诊科的患者,在到达急诊科时,使用EPI-INFO™(佐治亚州亚特兰大:疾病控制与预防中心)程序生成的数字随机分为两组(A组和B组)。随机分组列表由一位不与患者接触的作者保存。两组患者分别接受:(A)布比卡因筋膜髂骨阻滞加胃肠外注射生理盐水,或(B)相同的阻滞加生理盐水和静脉注射非甾体抗炎药。纳入研究后,获取血压、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)等生命体征以及疼痛强度测量值[使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)],并在15分钟、2小时和8小时重复测量。记录并发症的发生情况。

结果

175例患者被随机分组,21例被排除参与研究。其余154例患者分为:A组(n = 62)或B组(n = 92)。所有患者到达急诊科时使用VAS评估的平均疼痛水平为8.21±0.91(CI 95%:6.43 - 9.99);A组VAS为7.6±0.22,B组为8.5±0.72(p = 0.411)。在15分钟评估时,数值为:A组6.24±0.17,B组2.9±0.16(p < 0.001)。在2小时评估时,数值为:A组1.78±0.11,B组2.3±1.16(p = 0.764)。8小时时,A组VAS为2.03±0.12,B组为4.4±0.91(p = 0.083)。

结论

本研究表明:(1)胃肠外非甾体抗炎药对老年患者髋部骨折后的镇痛非常有效,(2)筋膜髂骨区域阻滞在给药后长达约8小时内效果相近,(3)区域筋膜髂骨阻滞能有效控制髋部骨折后的疼痛。(4)筋膜髂骨区域阻滞起效迅速。

相似文献

2
[Continuous fascia iliaca compartment block combined with oral analgesics for pre-operative pain control in elderly hip fracture patients].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 13;98(10):723-727. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.10.002.
5
Single fascia iliaca compartment block for post-hip fracture pain relief.
J Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;32(3):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.08.011. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
6
Fascia iliaca block for pain control in hip fracture patients.
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017 Nov-Dec;61(6):383-389. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

3
History of the Nerve Block.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Nov 11;16:125260. doi: 10.52965/001c.125260. eCollection 2024.
6
NSAIDs for Pain Control During the Peri-Operative Period of Hip Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Drugs Aging. 2024 Feb;41(2):125-139. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01074-w. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
7
Peripheral Nerve Block and Peri-operative Neurocognitive Disorders in Older Patients With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2023 Jul 4;14:21514593231186722. doi: 10.1177/21514593231186722. eCollection 2023.
9
Tunneled Fascia Iliaca Catheter Placement for Chronic Pain From Advanced Osteosarcoma.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 21;15(3):e36475. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36475. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Single fascia iliaca compartment block for post-hip fracture pain relief.
J Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;32(3):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.08.011. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
2
Fascia iliaca compartment block for femoral bone fractures in prehospital care.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):203-7. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2003.50134.
3
Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Mar;51(3):364-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51110.x.
4
Effect of birth cohort on risk of hip fracture: age-specific incidence rates in the Framingham Study.
Am J Public Health. 2002 May;92(5):858-62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.5.858.
6
Femoral nerve block in extracapsular femoral neck fractures.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Nov;77(6):922-3.
7
Femoral nerve block--the anatomical basis for a single injection technique.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1983 Feb;11(1):40-2. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8301100108.
8
Importance of effective pain control.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1987;85:1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1987.tb02665.x.
9
Femoral nerve block for analgesia in fractures of the femoral neck.
Arch Emerg Med. 1988 Sep;5(3):173-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.5.3.173.
10
Osteoporosis and hip fractures.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1990 Aug;16(3):717-40.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验