Godoy Monzón Daniel, Vazquez Jorge, Jauregui José R, Iserson Kenneth V
Int J Emerg Med. 2010 Nov 6;3(4):321-5. doi: 10.1007/s12245-010-0234-4.
This prospective, randomized double-blind study, conducted over 19 months in a tertiary care ED, sought to determine if a fascia-iliaca regional anesthetic block provides better and safer pain relief than does parenteral analgesia.
This study also aimed to determine the effectiveness of parenteral NSAID analgesia for acute hip fractures.
Patients >65 years old presenting at an adult ED with acute hip fractures were randomized upon presentation to the ED into two groups (A and B) using numbers generated by the EPI-INFO™ (Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) program. The randomization list was kept by one of the authors who did not interact with the patients. Two groups of patients were to receive either (A) a fascia-iliaca block with bupivacaine and parenteral saline injection, or (B) the same block with saline and an IV NSAID injection. Upon admission to the study, vital signs such as blood pressure, mean blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and pain-intensity measurements [using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] were obtained and repeated at 15 min, 2 h and at8 h. The occurrence of complications was registered.
One hundred seventy-five patients were randomized, and 21 were excluded from participation. The remaining 154 patients were grouped as: group A (n = 62) or group B (n = 92). The mean pain level on admission to the ED for all patients, assessed with the VAS, was 8.21 ± 0.91 (CI 95%: 6.43-9.99); in group A the VAS was 7.6 ± 0.22 and in group B 8.5 ± 0.72 (p = 0.411). At 15-min evaluation, values were: group A 6.24 ± 0.17 and group B 2.9 ± 0.16 (p < 0.001). At the 2-h assessment, values were: group A 1.78 ± 0.11 and group B 2.3 ± 1.16 (p = 0.764). At 8 h the VAS for group A was 2.03 ± 0.12 and for group B 4.4 ± 0.91 (p = 0.083).
THIS STUDY DEMONSTRATES THAT: (1) parenteral NSAIDs are very effective as analgesics after hip fractures in elderly patients, (2) fascia-iliaca regional blocks are nearly as effective for up to about 8 h after administration and (3) regional fascia-iliaca blocks effectively control post-hip fracture pain. (4) Fascia iliaca regional block has a rapid onset.
这项前瞻性、随机双盲研究在一家三级护理急诊科进行,为期19个月,旨在确定筋膜髂骨区域麻醉阻滞是否比胃肠外镇痛提供更好、更安全的疼痛缓解效果。
本研究还旨在确定胃肠外非甾体抗炎药镇痛对急性髋部骨折的有效性。
年龄大于65岁、因急性髋部骨折就诊于成人急诊科的患者,在到达急诊科时,使用EPI-INFO™(佐治亚州亚特兰大:疾病控制与预防中心)程序生成的数字随机分为两组(A组和B组)。随机分组列表由一位不与患者接触的作者保存。两组患者分别接受:(A)布比卡因筋膜髂骨阻滞加胃肠外注射生理盐水,或(B)相同的阻滞加生理盐水和静脉注射非甾体抗炎药。纳入研究后,获取血压、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)等生命体征以及疼痛强度测量值[使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)],并在15分钟、2小时和8小时重复测量。记录并发症的发生情况。
175例患者被随机分组,21例被排除参与研究。其余154例患者分为:A组(n = 62)或B组(n = 92)。所有患者到达急诊科时使用VAS评估的平均疼痛水平为8.21±0.91(CI 95%:6.43 - 9.99);A组VAS为7.6±0.22,B组为8.5±0.72(p = 0.411)。在15分钟评估时,数值为:A组6.24±0.17,B组2.9±0.16(p < 0.001)。在2小时评估时,数值为:A组1.78±0.11,B组2.3±1.16(p = 0.764)。8小时时,A组VAS为2.03±0.12,B组为4.4±0.91(p = 0.083)。
本研究表明:(1)胃肠外非甾体抗炎药对老年患者髋部骨折后的镇痛非常有效,(2)筋膜髂骨区域阻滞在给药后长达约8小时内效果相近,(3)区域筋膜髂骨阻滞能有效控制髋部骨折后的疼痛。(4)筋膜髂骨区域阻滞起效迅速。