• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与连续股外侧肌间隔阻滞对全髋关节置换术后疼痛管理和股四头肌肌力的比较:一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。

Comparison of continuous pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus continuous fascia iliaca compartment block on pain management and quadriceps muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Xi'an Aerospace General Hospital, Xi'an, China.

Department of Joint Surgery, Xi 'an Aerospace General Hospital, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 11;23(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02190-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-023-02190-1
PMID:37434138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10334586/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This investigation aimed to evaluate the impact of continuous pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and continuous fascia iliac compartment block (FICB) on postoperative pain following total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, and controlled trial recruited a cohort of fifty-seven patients with unilateral femoral neck fractures from Xi'an Aerospace General Hospital in northwest China between July 2020 and November 2021. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the continuous PENG block group (PENG group, n = 29) and the continuous FICB group (FICB group, n = 28). Under ultrasound guidance, PENG block and FICB procedures were performed prior to spinal anesthesia, utilizing 20 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine for PENG block and 30 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine for FICB. Subsequently, a catheter was inserted. All study participants received a standardized postoperative multimodal analgesic regimen, including intravenous administration of 30 mg Ketorolac tromethamine every eight hours and patient-controlled neural analgesia (PCNA) after surgery. Numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during exercise were recorded at various time points: prior to block (T0), 30 min post-blockade (T1), and 6 h (T2), 12 h (T3), 24 h (T4), and 48 h (T5) postoperatively. Additional data collected encompassed postoperative quadriceps muscle strength, the time of initial ambulation after surgery, the number of effective PCNA activations, rescue analgesia requirements, and occurrences of adverse events (such as nausea and vomiting, hematoma, infection, catheter detachment, or displacement) within 48 h following surgery.

RESULTS

In the PENG group, the resting NRS pain scores exhibited lower values at T1, T4, and T5 than those at T0. Furthermore, exercise NRS pain scores at T1-T5 were lower in the PENG group than in the FICB group. Similarly, during the same postoperative period, the PENG group demonstrated enhanced quadriceps strength on the affected side compared to the FICB group. Additionally, the PENG group displayed earlier postoperative ambulation and reduced occurrences of effective PCNA activations and rescue analgesia requirements compared to the FICB group.

CONCLUSION

Continuous PENG block exhibited superior analgesic efficacy after THA compared to continuous FICB, promoting recovery of quadriceps strength on the affected side and facilitating early postoperative ambulation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This clinical trial was registered in the China Clinical Trials Center ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) on 20/07/2020, with the registration number ChiCTR2000034821.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估连续囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞和连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)对全髋关节置换术(THA)后疼痛的影响。

方法

本前瞻性、随机、对照试验招募了 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 11 月期间来自中国西北部西安航天总医院的 57 例单侧股骨颈骨折患者。这些患者被随机分配到两组:连续 PENG 阻滞组(PENG 组,n=29)和连续 FICB 组(FICB 组,n=28)。在超声引导下,PENG 阻滞和 FICB 术前采用 20ml 0.25%罗哌卡因进行,FICB 采用 30ml 0.25%罗哌卡因进行。随后插入导管。所有研究参与者均接受标准化术后多模式镇痛方案,包括术后每 8 小时静脉注射 30mg 酮咯酸氨丁三醇和术后患者自控神经镇痛(PCNA)。在不同时间点记录静息和运动时的数字评分量表(NRS)评分:阻滞前(T0)、阻滞后 30 分钟(T1)、术后 6 小时(T2)、12 小时(T3)、24 小时(T4)和 48 小时(T5)。收集的其他数据包括术后股四头肌肌力、术后首次下床活动时间、有效 PCNA 激活次数、解救镇痛需求以及术后 48 小时内不良反应(如恶心呕吐、血肿、感染、导管脱落或移位)的发生情况。

结果

在 PENG 组中,T1、T4 和 T5 时的静息 NRS 疼痛评分低于 T0 时,T1-T5 时运动 NRS 疼痛评分也低于 FICB 组。同样,在相同的术后期间,与 FICB 组相比,PENG 组患侧股四头肌肌力增强。此外,与 FICB 组相比,PENG 组术后更早下床活动,有效 PCNA 激活次数和解救镇痛需求减少。

结论

与连续 FICB 相比,THA 后连续 PENG 阻滞具有更好的镇痛效果,促进患侧股四头肌肌力恢复,促进术后早期下床活动。

试验注册

本临床试验于 2020 年 7 月 20 日在中国临床试验中心(http://www.chictr.org.cn)注册,注册号 ChiCTR2000034821。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/a53453a5187b/12871_2023_2190_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/ea27b2481207/12871_2023_2190_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/ad19ca1faa37/12871_2023_2190_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/7e7115b1eda4/12871_2023_2190_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/85279b13c11e/12871_2023_2190_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/a53453a5187b/12871_2023_2190_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/ea27b2481207/12871_2023_2190_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/ad19ca1faa37/12871_2023_2190_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/7e7115b1eda4/12871_2023_2190_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/85279b13c11e/12871_2023_2190_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb2/10334586/a53453a5187b/12871_2023_2190_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of continuous pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus continuous fascia iliaca compartment block on pain management and quadriceps muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study.连续关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与连续股外侧肌间隔阻滞对全髋关节置换术后疼痛管理和股四头肌肌力的比较:一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 11;23(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02190-1.
2
Comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.髋关节置换术中囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞与股外侧皮神经阻滞和髂筋膜间隙阻滞(S-FICB)的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Anesth. 2023 Aug;37(4):503-510. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03192-6. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
3
The Analgesic effect of adding ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block to suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for hip fracture surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial.超声引导下囊周神经群阻滞联合髂筋膜间隙阻滞用于髋部骨折手术的镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Nov 3;102(44):e35649. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035649.
4
Comparison of analgesic effects of pericapsular nerve group block and fascia iliaca compartment block during hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.髋关节置换术中关节囊周围神经组阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Nov;67(11):962-972. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_672_23. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
5
Comparison of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for pain control in hip fractures: A double-blind prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.经皮髋关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与股神经周围筋膜腔阻滞(FICB)用于髋部骨折疼痛控制的比较:一项双盲前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Feb;108(1):103135. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103135. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
6
Pericapsular nerve group block versus fascia iliaca block for perioperative analgesia in hip fracture surgery: a prospective randomized trial.关节囊周围神经群阻滞与腹侧股骨阻滞用于髋部骨折手术的围手术期镇痛:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Nov 29;46:93. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.93.41117. eCollection 2023.
7
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block versus Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.全髋关节置换术中关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞与腹股沟上筋膜髂筋膜间隙阻滞的比较:一项随机临床试验
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 6;12(3):408. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030408.
8
Optimizing Rapid Recovery After Anterior Hip Arthroplasty Surgery: A Comparative Study of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block and Local Infiltration Analgesia.优化髋关节置换术后快速康复:股外侧肌间隔阻滞与局部浸润镇痛的对比研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7):1338-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.040. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
9
Comparison between supra-inguinal fascia iliaca and pericapsular nerve group blocks on postoperative pain and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty: A noninferiority randomised clinical trial.在全髋关节置换术后,比较骼腹股沟筋膜和囊周神经群阻滞对术后疼痛和功能恢复的影响:一项非劣效性随机临床试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Sep 1;40(9):660-671. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001875. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
10
Evaluation of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Analgesic Effect in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty.评价囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞对老年股骨颈骨折行髋关节置换术患者的镇痛效果。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 9;2022:7452716. doi: 10.1155/2022/7452716. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of pericapsular nerve group block and fascia Iliaca compartment block on postoperative analgesia and early rehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.关节囊周围神经组阻滞和髂筋膜间隙阻滞对老年全髋关节置换术患者术后镇痛及早期康复的影响
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03137-8.
2
Comparative analysis of continuous pericapsular nerve group block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.连续关节周围神经组阻滞与腹股沟上髂筋膜间隙阻滞用于全髋关节置换术后镇痛的比较分析:一项随机对照试验
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 6;20(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06055-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Retracted: Evaluation of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Analgesic Effect in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty.撤稿:评估关节周围神经组(PENG)阻滞对行髋关节置换术的老年股骨颈骨折患者的镇痛效果。
J Healthc Eng. 2023 Oct 4;2023:9893873. doi: 10.1155/2023/9893873. eCollection 2023.
2
Preoperative pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.全髋关节置换术前关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Mar;47(3):155-160. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103228. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
3
Efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block for pain control and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
关节囊周围神经阻滞对全髋关节置换术后疼痛控制和功能恢复的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Aug 4;10(8):589-599. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2024-0105.
4
Comparative Analysis of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Prospective Study.全髋关节置换术后疼痛管理中关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞与股神经阻滞的比较分析:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Cureus. 2025 May 27;17(5):e84887. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84887. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Effects of ultrasound‑guided pericapsular nerve group block in combination with laryngeal mask airway on anesthesia, postoperative analgesia, and recovery of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture undergoing closed reduction and internal fixation.超声引导下关节周围神经群阻滞联合喉罩气道对老年股骨颈骨折患者行闭合复位内固定术的麻醉、术后镇痛及恢复的影响
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Jul 23;19(3):384-390. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2024.17886. eCollection 2024 Oct 16.
6
Analgesic effect of ropivacaine combined with methylene blue in fascia Iliaca block for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.罗哌卡因联合亚甲蓝在髋关节置换术患者髂筋膜阻滞中的镇痛效果
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Mar 14;26(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08490-6.
7
Effects of pericapsular nerve group block versus local anesthetic infiltration for postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.关节囊周围神经组阻滞与局部麻醉浸润用于全髋关节置换术后镇痛的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0319102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319102. eCollection 2025.
8
Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block for functional outcome in patients undergoing hip surgeries - A randomised controlled study.髋关节手术患者功能结局的关节周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与腹股沟上髂筋膜(SIFI)阻滞对比——一项随机对照研究
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Dec;68(12):1043-1048. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_838_24. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
9
Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Catheter Procedure for Postoperative Joint Motion Limitation Rehabilitation.腹股沟上筋膜髂骨阻滞和关节周围神经组阻滞导管置入术用于术后关节活动受限康复
Cureus. 2025 Jan 5;17(1):e76935. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76935. eCollection 2025 Jan.
10
Peripheral Nerve Blocks Are Associated With Decreased Early Medical Complications, Dislocations, and Opioid Consumption Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后,周围神经阻滞与早期医疗并发症、脱位及阿片类药物使用量减少相关。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Dec 24;31:101587. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101587. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Comparison of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for pain control in hip fractures: A double-blind prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
经皮髋关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与股神经周围筋膜腔阻滞(FICB)用于髋部骨折疼痛控制的比较:一项双盲前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Feb;108(1):103135. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103135. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
4
A possible mechanism of motor blockade of high volume pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block: A cadaveric study.大容量关节周围神经群(PENG)阻滞运动阻滞的一种可能机制:一项尸体研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Nov;74:110407. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110407. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
5
Cadaveric investigation of the minimum effective volume for ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block.超声引导下骼筋膜间隙阻滞的最小有效容量的尸体研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Sep;46(9):757-762. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102563. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
6
Continuous pericapsular nerve group block for postoperative pain management in total hip arthroplasty: report of two cases.连续关节囊周围神经组阻滞用于全髋关节置换术后疼痛管理:两例报告
JA Clin Rep. 2021 Mar 7;7(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40981-021-00423-1.
7
Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides improved short-term analgesia compared with the femoral nerve block in hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized comparative trial.关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与股神经阻滞相比,可为髋关节骨折手术提供更好的短期镇痛效果:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 May;46(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102315. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
8
What's New in Hip Replacement.髋关节置换的新进展
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Sep 16;102(18):1572-1580. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00927.
9
Lumbar plexus block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty: A single-blinded, randomized trial.全髋关节置换术中腰丛阻滞与腹股沟上髂筋膜阻滞的比较:一项单盲随机试验
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Nov;66:109907. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109907. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
10
The effect of ropivacaine concentration on common peroneal nerve block duration using a fixed dose: A randomised, double-blind trial in healthy volunteers.固定剂量罗哌卡因浓度对腓总神经阻滞持续时间的影响:一项健康志愿者的随机、双盲试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Apr;37(4):316-322. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001112.