• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞士的高血压治疗。2009 年瑞士高血压调查(SWISSHYPE)。

Medical treatment of hypertension in Switzerland. The 2009 Swiss Hypertension Survey (SWISSHYPE).

机构信息

Swiss Cardiovascular Center Bern, University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Mar 4;141:w13169. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13169. eCollection 2011.

DOI:10.4414/smw.2011.13169
PMID:21374529
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Despite a broad and efficient pharmacological antihypertensive armamentarium, blood pressure (BP) control is suboptimal and heterogeneous throughout Europe. Recent representative data from Switzerland are limited. The goal of the present survey was therefore to assess the actual control rate of high BP in Switzerland in accordance with current guidelines. The influence of risk factors, target organ damage and medication on BP levels and control was also evaluated.

METHODS

A cross-sectional visit-based survey of ambulatory hypertensive patients was performed in 2009 in Switzerland. 281 randomly selected physicians provided data on 5 consecutive hypertensive patients attending their practices for BP follow-up. Data were anonymously collected on demographics, comorbidities and current medication, and BP was recorded. Subsequent modification of pharmacological antihypertensive therapy was assessed.

RESULTS

Data from 1376 patients were available. Mean age was 65 ± 12 years, 53.9% were male subjects. 26.4% had complicated hypertension. Overall, BP control (<140/90 mm Hg for uncomplicated and <130/80 mm Hg for complicated hypertension) was achieved in 48.9%. Compared to patients with complicated hypertension, BP control was better in patients with uncomplicated hypertension (59.4% vs. 19.2%, p <0.001). As a monotherapy the most prescribed drug class were angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB, 41%), followed by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (21.5%), betablockers (20.8%) and calcium channel blockers (CCB, 10.8%). The most prescribed drug combinations were ARB + diuretic (30.1%) and ACE inhibitors + diuretic (15.3%). 46% were receiving a fixed drug combination. In only 32.7% of patients with uncontrolled hypertension was a change in drug therapy made.

CONCLUSION

This representative survey on treated adult hypertensive patients shows that, compared to earlier reports, the control rate of hypertension has improved in Switzerland for uncomplicated but not for complicated, particularly diabetes-associated hypertension. ARBs and ACE inhibitors are the most prescribed antihypertensive drugs for monotherapy, whereas diuretics and ARBs were the most used for combination therapy.

摘要

目的

尽管有广泛而有效的药理学降压武器库,但整个欧洲的血压(BP)控制仍不理想且存在异质性。来自瑞士的最新代表性数据有限。因此,本调查的目的是根据当前指南评估瑞士高血压的实际控制率。还评估了危险因素、靶器官损伤和药物对 BP 水平和控制的影响。

方法

2009 年在瑞士进行了一项基于门诊高血压患者的横断面调查。281 名随机选择的医生提供了在其诊所进行 BP 随访的 5 名连续高血压患者的数据。收集了人口统计学、合并症和当前药物治疗的数据,并记录了 BP。评估了随后对降压药物治疗的修改。

结果

共获得 1376 名患者的数据。平均年龄为 65±12 岁,53.9%为男性。26.4%患有复杂高血压。总体而言,未合并高血压的患者中(<140/90mmHg),血压控制率达到 48.9%。与患有复杂高血压的患者相比,未合并高血压的患者血压控制更好(59.4%对 19.2%,p<0.001)。作为单一疗法,最常开的药物类别是血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB,41%),其次是血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI,21.5%)、β受体阻滞剂(20.8%)和钙通道阻滞剂(CCB,10.8%)。最常开的药物组合是 ARB+利尿剂(30.1%)和 ACEI+利尿剂(15.3%)。46%的患者接受固定药物联合治疗。在未控制的高血压患者中,仅有 32.7%改变了药物治疗。

结论

这项针对成年高血压患者的代表性调查显示,与早期报告相比,瑞士未经治疗的高血压控制率有所提高,但复杂高血压,尤其是糖尿病相关高血压的控制率没有提高。ARB 和 ACEI 是用于单一疗法的最常开的降压药物,而利尿剂和 ARB 是用于联合疗法的最常开的药物。

相似文献

1
Medical treatment of hypertension in Switzerland. The 2009 Swiss Hypertension Survey (SWISSHYPE).瑞士的高血压治疗。2009 年瑞士高血压调查(SWISSHYPE)。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Mar 4;141:w13169. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13169. eCollection 2011.
2
[Assessment of antihypertensive monotherapies effectiveness by home blood pressure self-measurement in hypertensive patients].通过家庭血压自我测量评估高血压患者单一抗高血压疗法的有效性
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2012 Jun;61(3):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 May 23.
3
Choice of antihypertensive medications among physicians and its impact on blood pressure control among Nigerians living with hypertension.医生对降压药物的选择及其对尼日利亚高血压患者血压控制的影响。
Niger J Med. 2016 Jul-Sep;25(3):220-5.
4
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.
5
Retrospective analysis of real-world efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers versus other classes of antihypertensive agents in blood pressure management.回顾性分析血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与其他降压药类别在血压管理中的真实世界疗效。
Clin Ther. 2011 Sep;33(9):1190-203. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
6
Current status of antihypertensive prescription and associated blood pressure control in Japan.日本抗高血压药物处方现状及相关血压控制情况
Hypertens Res. 2006 Mar;29(3):143-51. doi: 10.1291/hypres.29.143.
7
Antihypertensive drug treatment changes in the general population: the CoLaus study.普通人群中降压药物治疗的变化:CoLaus研究
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Mar 31;15:20. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-20.
8
HYT-hypertension in Turkey: a cross-sectional survey on blood pressure control with calcium channel blockers alone or combined with other antihypertensive drugs.土耳其的HYT高血压:关于单独使用钙通道阻滞剂或与其他抗高血压药物联合使用时血压控制情况的横断面调查
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2015 Jun;22(2):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s40292-015-0091-6. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
9
Costs of current antihypertensive therapy in Switzerland: an economic evaluation of 3,489 patients in primary care.瑞士当前抗高血压治疗的成本:初级保健中 3489 名患者的经济评估。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Oct 25;143:w13854. doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13854. eCollection 2013.
10
Association between cardiovascular outcomes and antihypertensive drug treatment in older women.老年女性心血管结局与降压药物治疗之间的关联
JAMA. 2004 Dec 15;292(23):2849-59. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.23.2849.

引用本文的文献

1
No association between genetic markers and hypertension control in multiple cross-sectional studies.在多个横断面研究中,遗传标记与高血压控制之间没有关联。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 21;13(1):11811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39103-8.
2
Factors influencing harmonized health data collection, sharing and linkage in Denmark and Switzerland: A systematic review.影响丹麦和瑞士协调健康数据收集、共享和链接的因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0226015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226015. eCollection 2019.
3
Antihypertensive drug treatment changes in the general population: the CoLaus study.
普通人群中降压药物治疗的变化:CoLaus研究
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Mar 31;15:20. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-20.
4
Shared decision-making in antihypertensive therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trial.在降压治疗中的共享决策:一项集群随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Sep 11;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-135.