• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在降压治疗中的共享决策:一项集群随机对照试验。

Shared decision-making in antihypertensive therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of General Practice, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Elsässerstr 2m, Freiburg 79110, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Sep 11;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-135.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-14-135
PMID:24024587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3847233/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is one of the key factors causing cardiovascular diseases. A substantial proportion of treated hypertensive patients do not reach recommended target blood pressure values. Shared decision making (SDM) is to enhance the active role of patients. As until now there exists little information on the effects of SDM training in antihypertensive therapy, we tested the effect of an SDM training programme for general practitioners (GPs). Our hypotheses are that this SDM training (1) enhances the participation of patients and (2) leads to an enhanced decrease in blood pressure (BP) values, compared to patients receiving usual care without prior SDM training for GPs.

METHODS

The study was conducted as a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) with GP practices in Southwest Germany. Each GP practice included patients with treated but uncontrolled hypertension and/or with relevant comorbidity. After baseline assessment (T0) GP practices were randomly allocated into an intervention and a control arm. GPs of the intervention group took part in the SDM training. GPs of the control group treated their patients as usual. The intervention was blinded to the patients. Primary endpoints on patient level were (1) change of patients' perceived participation (SDM-Q-9) and (2) change of systolic BP (24h-mean). Secondary endpoints were changes of (1) diastolic BP (24h-mean), (2) patients' knowledge about hypertension, (3) adherence (MARS-D), and (4) cardiovascular risk score (CVR).

RESULTS

In total 1357 patients from 36 general practices were screened for blood pressure control by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Thereof 1120 patients remained in the study because of uncontrolled (but treated) hypertension and/or a relevant comorbidity. At T0 the intervention group involved 17 GP practices with 552 patients and the control group 19 GP practices with 568 patients. The effectiveness analysis could not demonstrate a significant or relevant effect of the SDM training on any of the endpoints.

CONCLUSION

The study hypothesis that the SDM training enhanced patients' perceived participation and lowered their BP could not be confirmed. Further research is needed to examine the impact of patient participation on the treatment of hypertension in primary care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00000125.

摘要

背景

高血压是导致心血管疾病的关键因素之一。相当一部分接受治疗的高血压患者未达到推荐的血压目标值。共同决策(SDM)旨在增强患者的积极作用。由于目前关于 SDM 培训在降压治疗中的效果的信息很少,我们测试了对全科医生(GP)进行 SDM 培训计划的效果。我们的假设是,与未接受过 SDM 培训的 GP 接受常规护理的患者相比,这种 SDM 培训(1)增强了患者的参与度,(2)导致血压(BP)值的降低更为明显。

方法

该研究采用德国西南部的 GP 实践的集群随机对照试验(cRCT)进行。每个 GP 实践都包括接受治疗但血压控制不佳和/或有相关合并症的高血压患者。在基线评估(T0)后,GP 实践被随机分配到干预组和对照组。干预组的 GP 参加了 SDM 培训。对照组的 GP 按照常规治疗患者。患者对干预措施不知情。患者层面的主要终点是(1)患者感知参与度的变化(SDM-Q-9)和(2)收缩压(24 小时平均值)的变化。次要终点是(1)舒张压(24 小时平均值)的变化,(2)患者对高血压的认识,(3)依从性(MARS-D)和(4)心血管风险评分(CVR)的变化。

结果

共有 36 个 GP 诊所的 1357 名患者通过动态血压监测(ABPM)筛查血压控制情况。其中 1120 名患者因血压控制不佳(但接受治疗)和/或有相关合并症而继续留在研究中。在 T0,干预组有 17 个 GP 诊所的 552 名患者,对照组有 19 个 GP 诊所的 568 名患者。有效性分析未能证明 SDM 培训对任何终点都有显著或相关的效果。

结论

SDM 培训增强了患者的感知参与度并降低了他们的血压的研究假设不能得到证实。需要进一步研究以检查患者参与对初级保健中高血压治疗的影响。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册处(DRKS):DRKS00000125。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/733f097a055d/1471-2296-14-135-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/24225a336edb/1471-2296-14-135-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/f982bcf7fb7a/1471-2296-14-135-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/e03d48efe29a/1471-2296-14-135-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/9d927cd2dd57/1471-2296-14-135-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/733f097a055d/1471-2296-14-135-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/24225a336edb/1471-2296-14-135-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/f982bcf7fb7a/1471-2296-14-135-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/e03d48efe29a/1471-2296-14-135-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/9d927cd2dd57/1471-2296-14-135-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a290/3847233/733f097a055d/1471-2296-14-135-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Shared decision-making in antihypertensive therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trial.在降压治疗中的共享决策:一项集群随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Sep 11;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-135.
2
Implementation of shared decision making by physician training to optimise hypertension treatment. Study protocol of a cluster-RCT.通过医生培训实施共享决策以优化高血压治疗。一项集群 RCT 的研究方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012 Sep 11;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-73.
3
The effectiveness of shared decision-making followed by positive reinforcement on physical disability in the long-term follow-up of patients with nonspecific low back pain in primary care: a clustered randomised controlled trial.在初级保健中对非特异性腰痛患者进行长期随访时,共享决策制定随后进行积极强化对身体残疾的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 28;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0776-8.
4
[Shared decision-making with hypertensive patients. Results of an implementation in Germany].[与高血压患者共同决策。在德国的实施结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006 Nov 17;131(46):2592-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-956254.
5
Informed shared decision-making programme for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.基层医疗中2型糖尿病患者的知情共同决策项目:整群随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e024004. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024004.
6
Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.基于患者的结局,来自一项在全科医疗中开展的关于共同决策技能培养及风险沟通辅助工具使用的整群随机试验。
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):347-54. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh402.
7
Activating GENeral practitioners dialogue with patients on their Agenda (MultiCare AGENDA) study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.启动全科医生与患者就其议程进行对话(MultiCare AGENDA)研究方案:一项群组随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 12;13:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-118.
8
Shared decision making PLUS - a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS).共享决策制定增强版——一项针对精神分裂症住院患者的整群随机试验(SDM-PLUS)。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1240-3.
9
Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial.将常规结果监测作为信息来源用于精神卫生保健中的共同决策:一项整群随机对照试验
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Dec 15;15:313. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0696-2.
10
Shared decision making in primary care: Process evaluation of the intervention in the OPTIMAL study, a cluster randomised trial.初级保健中的共享决策:干预措施在 OPTIMAL 研究中的过程评估,一项集群随机试验。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Jun;16(3):375-380. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care clinician education interventions for improving blood pressure control for people prescribed antihypertensive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.初级保健临床医生教育干预措施对接受抗高血压治疗患者血压控制的改善作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 28;15(8):e087692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087692.
2
Factors influencing role preferences in decision-making of healthy women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants: subanalysis from a randomised controlled decision coaching trial.影响携带BRCA1/2致病变异的健康女性决策中角色偏好的因素:一项随机对照决策指导试验的亚分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 28;25(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13541-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of improved patient participation in primary care on health-related outcomes: a systematic review.改善初级保健中患者参与度对健康相关结局的影响:系统评价。
Fam Pract. 2013 Aug;30(4):365-78. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt014. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
2
Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.比较九项共享决策问卷与 OPTION 量表——尝试建立聚合效度。
Health Expect. 2015 Feb;18(1):137-50. doi: 10.1111/hex.12022. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
3
Implementation of shared decision making by physician training to optimise hypertension treatment. Study protocol of a cluster-RCT.
The impact of doctor-patient communication on medication adherence and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review.
医患沟通对高血压患者药物依从性和血压控制的影响:一项系统综述
PeerJ. 2024 Nov 28;12:e18527. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18527. eCollection 2024.
4
Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.卫生保健专业人员在高血压患者血压控制干预措施成功中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Aug;17(8):e010396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010396. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
5
A systematic review of shared decision making training programs for general practitioners.系统评价全科医生共享决策培训方案。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 29;24(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05557-1.
6
The impact of communication training on the clinical care of hypertension in general practice: a cluster randomized controlled trial in China.沟通培训对全科医疗中高血压临床护理的影响:中国的一项群组随机对照试验。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Mar 26;25(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02344-1.
7
Shared Decision-Making in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.共享决策在心血管危险因素管理中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243779. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3779.
8
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
9
Cardiovascular disease risk communication and prevention: a meta-analysis.心血管疾病风险沟通与预防:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Mar 27;45(12):998-1013. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae002.
10
Shared decision-making improving efficacy in diarrhoea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome in Chinese outpatient setting: protocol of a prospective, randomised controlled trial.在中文门诊环境中,通过共享决策提高腹泻型肠易激综合征的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 18;13(12):e077605. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077605.
通过医生培训实施共享决策以优化高血压治疗。一项集群 RCT 的研究方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012 Sep 11;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-73.
4
Trends in blood pressure and hypertension detection, treatment, and control 1980 to 2009: the Minnesota Heart Survey.1980 年至 2009 年血压和高血压检测、治疗及控制的趋势:明尼苏达心脏调查。
Circulation. 2012 Oct 9;126(15):1852-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098517. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
5
Missed opportunities for treatment of uncontrolled hypertension at physician office visits in the United States, 2005 through 2009.2005年至2009年美国医生办公室就诊时未控制高血压的治疗错失机会。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Sep 24;172(17):1344-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2749.
6
Training family physicians in shared decision-making to reduce the overuse of antibiotics in acute respiratory infections: a cluster randomized trial.培训家庭医生进行共享决策以减少急性呼吸道感染中抗生素的过度使用:一项集群随机试验。
CMAJ. 2012 Sep 18;184(13):E726-34. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120568. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
7
Training health professionals in shared decision-making: an international environmental scan.培训医疗卫生专业人员进行共同决策:国际环境扫描。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):159-69. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
8
Patients' perceptions of sharing in decisions: a systematic review of interventions to enhance shared decision making in routine clinical practice.患者对决策分享的看法:系统评价常规临床实践中增强共享决策的干预措施。
Patient. 2012;5(1):1-19. doi: 10.2165/11592180-000000000-00000.
9
Uncontrolled and apparent treatment resistant hypertension in the United States, 1988 to 2008.美国 1988 年至 2008 年期间不受控制且明显的治疗抵抗性高血压。
Circulation. 2011 Aug 30;124(9):1046-58. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.030189. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
10
Medical treatment of hypertension in Switzerland. The 2009 Swiss Hypertension Survey (SWISSHYPE).瑞士的高血压治疗。2009 年瑞士高血压调查(SWISSHYPE)。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Mar 4;141:w13169. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13169. eCollection 2011.