Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkane, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
J Pharm Sci. 2011 May;100(5):1847-55. doi: 10.1002/jps.22423. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
The vaporization, fusion, and sublimation enthalpies of methyl, ethyl, propyl, and butyl paraben are reported and compared with literature values. The vaporization enthalpies were measured by correlation gas chromatography and the fusion enthalpies by differential scanning calorimetry. Adjusted to T = 298.15 K, these enthalpies were combined to yield the sublimation enthalpy. The results compare favorably to some of the literature values but do not support the reversal in magnitude of both the vaporization and sublimation enthalpy previously reported for propyl and butyl paraben. The following fusion and vaporization enthalpies were measured for methyl through to butyl paraben, respectively: ΔH(fus) (T(fus) ) 26.3 ± 0.1 (398.6 K), 26.5 ± 0.1 (388.5 K), 27.3 ± 0.1 (368.8), and 25.9 ± 0.3 (340.7 K) kJ·mol(-1); ΔH(vap) (298.15 K) 79.5 ± 0.5, 84.0 ± 0.5, 89.7 ± 0.6, and 95.8 ± 0.6 kJ·mol(-1). The results are believed to be accurate to ± 4 kJ·mol(-1).
报告了甲基、乙基、丙基和丁基对羟基苯甲酸酯的蒸发焓、熔融焓和升华焓,并与文献值进行了比较。蒸发焓通过相关气相色谱法测量,熔融焓通过差示扫描量热法测量。调整至 T = 298.15 K 后,将这些焓合并以得出升华焓。结果与一些文献值相当,但不支持先前报道的丙基和丁基对羟基苯甲酸酯的蒸发焓和升华焓大小反转。以下是分别通过甲基到丁基对羟基苯甲酸酯测量得到的熔融焓和蒸发焓:ΔH(fus) (T(fus) ) 26.3 ± 0.1 (398.6 K)、26.5 ± 0.1 (388.5 K)、27.3 ± 0.1 (368.8) 和 25.9 ± 0.3 (340.7 K) kJ·mol(-1);ΔH(vap) (298.15 K) 79.5 ± 0.5、84.0 ± 0.5、89.7 ± 0.6 和 95.8 ± 0.6 kJ·mol(-1)。结果被认为准确到 ± 4 kJ·mol(-1)。