Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), 723 W. Michigan St., Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Chemosphere. 2011 Aug;84(6):759-66. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.019. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
The role that phosphorite formation, the ultimate source rock for fertilizer phosphate reserves, plays in the marine phosphorus (P) cycle has long been debated. A shift has occurred from early models that evoked strikingly different oceanic P cycling during times of widespread phosphorite deposition to current thinking that phosphorite deposits may be lucky survivors of a series of inter-related tectonic, geochemical, sedimentological, and oceanic conditions. This paradigm shift has been facilitated by an awareness of the widespread nature of phosphogenesis-the formation of authigenic P-bearing minerals in marine sediments that contributes to phosphorite formation. This process occurs not just in continental margin sediments, but in deep sea oozes as well, and helps to clarify the driving forces behind phosphorite formation and links to marine P geochemistry. Two processes come into play to make phosphorite deposits: chemical dynamism and physical dynamism. Chemical dynamism involves the diagenetic release and subsequent concentration of P-bearing minerals particularly in horizons, controlled by a number of sedimentological and biogeochemical factors. Physical dynamism involves the reworking and sedimentary capping of P-rich sediments, which can either concentrate the relatively heavy and insoluble disseminated P-bearing minerals or provide an episodic change in sedimentology to concentrate chemically mobilized P. Both processes can result from along-margin current dynamics and/or sea level variations. Interestingly, net P accumulation rates are highest (i.e., the P removal pump is most efficient) when phosphorites are not forming. Both physical and chemical pathways involve processes not dominant in deep sea environments and in fact not often coincide in space and time even on continental margins, contributing to the rarity of high-quality phosphorite deposits and the limitation of phosphate rock reserves. This limitation is becoming critical, as the human demand for P far outstrips the geologic replacement for P and few prospects exist for new discoveries of phosphate rock.
磷块岩的形成是肥料磷储量的最终源岩,它在海洋磷(P)循环中所起的作用长期以来一直存在争议。从早期的模型到当前的观点,人们的观点发生了转变,早期的模型提出,在磷块岩广泛沉积的时期,海洋磷循环的情况截然不同,而当前的观点则认为,磷块岩矿床可能是一系列相互关联的构造、地球化学、沉积和海洋条件的幸运幸存者。这种范式转变是由于人们意识到磷的广泛形成——在海洋沉积物中形成自生含磷矿物,这有助于磷块岩的形成。这个过程不仅发生在大陆边缘沉积物中,也发生在深海软泥中,并有助于澄清磷块岩形成的驱动力及其与海洋磷地球化学的联系。有两个过程参与了磷块岩矿床的形成:化学动力学和物理动力学。化学动力学涉及磷-bearing矿物的成岩释放和随后的集中,特别是在受许多沉积学和生物地球化学因素控制的层位中。物理动力学涉及富磷沉积物的再搬运和沉积覆盖,这既可以集中相对较重且不溶的弥散含磷矿物,也可以提供一个突发的沉积学变化,集中化学可移动的 P。这两个过程都可以由沿边缘的海流动力和/或海平面变化引起。有趣的是,当磷块岩不形成时,净磷积累率最高(即磷去除泵效率最高)。物理和化学途径都涉及在深海环境中不占主导地位的过程,事实上,即使在大陆边缘,它们在空间和时间上也不经常同时发生,这导致高质量磷块岩矿床的稀有性和磷矿储量的限制。这种限制变得越来越关键,因为人类对磷的需求远远超过了磷的地质替代,而且几乎没有发现新的磷矿的前景。