Suppr超能文献

定义心脏再同步治疗时代的左束支传导阻滞。

Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2011 Mar 15;107(6):927-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.010.

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has emerged as an attractive intervention to improve left ventricular mechanical function by changing the sequence of electrical activation. Unfortunately, many patients receiving CRT do not benefit but are subjected to device complications and costs. Thus, there is a need for better selection criteria. Current criteria for CRT eligibility include a QRS duration ≥ 120 ms. However, QRS morphology is not considered, although it can indicate the cause of delayed conduction. Recent studies have suggested that only patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) benefit from CRT, and not patients with right bundle branch block or nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay. The authors review the pathophysiologic and clinical evidence supporting why only patients with complete LBBB benefit from CRT. Furthermore, they review how the threshold of 120 ms to define LBBB was derived subjectively at a time when criteria for LBBB and right bundle branch block were mistakenly reversed. Three key studies over the past 65 years have suggested that 1/3 of patients diagnosed with LBBB by conventional electrocardiographic criteria may not have true complete LBBB, but likely have a combination of left ventricular hypertrophy and left anterior fascicular block. On the basis of additional insights from computer simulations, the investigators propose stricter criteria for complete LBBB that include a QRS duration ≥ 140 ms for men and ≥ 130 ms for women, along with mid-QRS notching or slurring in ≥ 2 contiguous leads. Further studies are needed to reinvestigate the electrocardiographic criteria for complete LBBB and the implications of these criteria for selecting patients for CRT.

摘要

心脏再同步治疗 (CRT) 已成为一种有吸引力的干预手段,通过改变电激活的顺序来改善左心室机械功能。不幸的是,许多接受 CRT 的患者并未从中获益,反而遭受了设备并发症和费用的困扰。因此,需要更好的选择标准。目前 CRT 适应证的标准包括 QRS 时限≥120ms。然而,QRS 形态并未被考虑在内,尽管它可以指示延迟传导的原因。最近的研究表明,只有左束支传导阻滞 (LBBB) 的患者从 CRT 中获益,而右束支传导阻滞或非特异性室内传导延迟的患者则没有获益。作者回顾了支持为什么只有完全性 LBBB 患者从 CRT 中获益的病理生理和临床证据。此外,他们还回顾了为什么将 120ms 作为定义 LBBB 的阈值是主观确定的,当时 LBBB 和右束支传导阻滞的标准被错误地颠倒了。过去 65 年来的三项关键研究表明,通过传统心电图标准诊断为 LBBB 的患者中有 1/3 可能没有真正的完全性 LBBB,而可能是左心室肥厚和左前分支阻滞的组合。基于计算机模拟的额外见解,研究人员提出了更严格的完全性 LBBB 标准,包括男性 QRS 时限≥140ms,女性 QRS 时限≥130ms,以及至少 2 个连续导联的 QRS 中端切迹或模糊。需要进一步的研究来重新调查完全性 LBBB 的心电图标准以及这些标准对 CRT 患者选择的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验