• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同叠加方法评价拔牙和非拔牙治疗效果。

Evaluation of extraction and non-extraction treatment effects by two different superimposition methods.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2011 Dec;33(6):691-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq143. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjq143
PMID:21378094
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether different evaluation methods may be the cause of the varied outcomes of research that have evaluated the effects of extraction and non-extraction therapy on jaw rotation. This retrospective study consisted of the pre- (T1) and post- (T2) treatment lateral cephalograms of 70 skeletal Class I subjects with an optimal vertical mandibular plane angle, who had undergone fixed orthodontic treatment. Thirty-five of the subjects (20 females and 15 males, mean age: 14.7 years) were treated with four first premolar extractions and 35 (22 females and 13 males, mean age: 15 years) without extractions. T1 and T2 radiographs were superimposed using Björk's structural method and Steiner's method of sella-nasion line registered at sella. A Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the changes between T1 and T2 and the Mann-Whitney U-test to determine differences between the extraction and non-extraction and Björk and Steiner groups. No significant difference was found between the methods of Steiner and Björk according to the spatial changes of the cephalometric points in the extraction and non-extraction groups. The maxilla showed forward rotation in the extraction group and backward rotation in the non-extraction group with both superimposition methods, but the differences were not significant in either inter- or intraclass comparisons. The mandible showed forward rotation in the extraction group with both superimposition methods but, in the non-extraction group, forward rotation was recorded with Björk's method and backward rotation with Steiner's method. These findings were not significant in either inter- or intraclass evaluations. No significant difference was found between the groups or methods.

摘要

本研究旨在确定不同的评价方法是否是导致评估拔牙和非拔牙治疗对下颌旋转影响的研究结果差异的原因。这是一项回顾性研究,共纳入 70 名具有理想垂直下颌平面角的骨性 I 类患者,这些患者均接受过固定正畸治疗。其中 35 名患者(20 名女性,15 名男性,平均年龄:14.7 岁)接受了上颌四颗第一前磨牙拔除,35 名患者(22 名女性,13 名男性,平均年龄:15 岁)未接受拔牙治疗。使用 Björk 结构法和 Steiner 法将 T1 和 T2 侧位头颅片重叠,在蝶鞍注册 Sella-Nasion 线。使用 Wilcoxon 检验评估 T1 和 T2 之间的变化,使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验确定拔牙和非拔牙组以及 Björk 和 Steiner 组之间的差异。根据拔牙和非拔牙组中头影测量点的空间变化,Steiner 法和 Björk 法之间没有发现显著差异。两种叠加方法均显示上颌在拔牙组中向前旋转,在非拔牙组中向后旋转,但在组间和组内比较中差异均无统计学意义。在两种叠加方法中,下颌在拔牙组中均显示向前旋转,但在非拔牙组中,Björk 法记录为向前旋转,Steiner 法记录为向后旋转。在组间和组内评估中,这些差异均无统计学意义。组间或方法间无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of extraction and non-extraction treatment effects by two different superimposition methods.两种不同叠加方法评价拔牙和非拔牙治疗效果。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Dec;33(6):691-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq143. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
2
Over-bite and vertical changes following first premolar extraction in high angle cases.高角病例拔除第一前磨牙后的覆牙合及垂直向变化。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Nov 1;13(6):812-8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1234.
3
Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.通过四种不同的头影测量重叠方法对正畸治疗进行影像学评估。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):29-36. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.029-036.oar.
4
Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.中 palate 微型植入钉和高拉头帽用于前后向和垂直支抗控制:治疗变化的头影测量比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):238-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.020.
5
Does upper premolar extraction affect the changes of pharyngeal airway volume after bimaxillary surgery in skeletal class III patients?拔除上颌前磨牙是否会影响骨性III类患者双颌手术后咽气道容积的变化?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;72(1):165.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.020.
6
Postsurgical stability after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation following upper premolar extraction.上颌前磨牙拔除后进行最小限度正畸准备的下颌后缩手术后的术后稳定性。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Nov;71(11):1968.e1-1968.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
7
Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.传统支抗磨牙远移治疗在生长发育中 II 类非患者中的软组织、骨骼和牙牙槽变化:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Prog Orthod. 2012 May;13(1):30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
8
Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.Begg 矫治器和预成直丝弓矫治器垂直向变化的头影测量比较
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Dec;33(6):712-20. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq176. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
9
Changes in natural head position after orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III patients.骨性III类患者正颌外科手术后自然头位的变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Jun;147(6):747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.026.
10
The effect of first premolar extraction on vertical dimension.第一前磨牙拔除对垂直距离的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul;116(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70301-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of premolar extraction and orthodontic treatment in adolescents - a retrospective cephalometric study.前磨牙拔除及正畸治疗对青少年的影响:一项回顾性头颅侧位片研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2024 Mar 26;83:92-100. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2023.2267145.
2
Efficacy of orthodontic mini implants for en masse retraction in the maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.正畸微型种植体在上颌整体远中移动中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Oct 25;4(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0144-4.