Suppr超能文献

Begg 矫治器和预成直丝弓矫治器垂直向变化的头影测量比较

Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.

机构信息

Division of Orthodontics, Department of Craniofacial Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030-1725, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2011 Dec;33(6):712-20. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq176. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to quantify and compare the vertical dimensional changes in bialveolar dental protrusion patients undergoing extraction of all four first premolars between the preadjusted edgewise appliance (PEA) and the Begg appliance. The cephalometric records of 55 patients (14 males and 41 females) with Class I bimaxillary protrusion were selected and divided into two groups based on the appliance used, i.e Begg or PEA mechanotherapy. To minimize the effects of growth, the subjects were at least in stage VI of skeletal maturation. The mean age was 18.25 ± 3.2 years for the Begg group and 18.03 ± 3.5 years for the PEA group. Skeletal and dental changes were analysed in both groups on lateral cephalograms taken pre- (T1) and post- (T2) treatment. A Student's t-test was used to analyse the treatment changes. Within group results showed a significant increase in face height and extrusion and mesial movement of the upper and lower molars for both groups. However, no significant differences were observed when the groups were compared. A significant correlation was found between the change in lower molar to mandibular plane angle and lower anterior face height for both groups. No significant difference was found when the Begg mechanotherapy was compared to the PEA technique on vertical dimensional changes. It can be speculated that mesial movement of the molars tended to keep pace with their extrusion and negated any bite opening effect with both mechanotherapies.

摘要

本回顾性研究的目的是量化和比较接受拔除全部四颗第一前磨牙的双颌前突患者在使用预成方丝弓矫治器(PEA)和Begg 矫治器时的牙槽垂直向变化。选择了 55 名(14 名男性和 41 名女性) Class I 双颌前突患者的头颅侧位片记录,并根据使用的矫治器(Begg 或 PEA 机械疗法)将患者分为两组。为了最小化生长的影响,受试者至少处于骨骼成熟的 VI 期。Begg 组的平均年龄为 18.25 ± 3.2 岁,PEA 组为 18.03 ± 3.5 岁。在治疗前(T1)和治疗后(T2)拍摄的头颅侧位片上分析了两组的骨骼和牙齿变化。使用学生 t 检验分析治疗变化。组内结果显示两组的面高度和上、下颌磨牙的伸长及近中移动均显著增加。然而,当比较两组时,没有观察到显著差异。两组的下颌磨牙与下颌平面角的变化与下前面高之间存在显著相关性。当将 Begg 机械疗法与 PEA 技术进行比较时,在下颌垂直向变化方面没有发现显著差异。可以推测,两种机械疗法中磨牙的近中移动倾向于跟上其伸长,从而抵消了任何咬开效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验