Carr T H, Dagenbach D
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1117.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Mar;16(2):341-50.
Two lexical decision experiments compared semantic and repetition priming by masked words. Experiment 1 established prime-mask stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) with presence-absence detection judgments. Primes presented at detection-threshold SOAs produced equal facilitation for repeated and semantically related targets: 26 ms and 24 ms. Experiment 2 established SOAs with semantic judgments. Primes presented at 70% of the semantic-threshold SOA to mimic the exposure conditions of Experiment 1 produced slightly greater facilitation for repeated targets but a tendency toward inhibition for semantically related targets: 38 ms and -6 ms. These results confirm Dagenbach, Carr, and Wilhelmsen's (1989) report that strategies induced by threshold-setting tasks can influence masked priming. In addition, Experiment 2 suggests a mechanism for retrieving weakly activated semantic codes into consciousness that relies on the center-surround principle to enhance activation of sought-for codes and to inhibit related codes stored nearby in the semantic network.
两项词汇判断实验比较了由掩蔽词引发的语义启动和重复启动。实验1通过有无检测判断来确定启动-掩蔽刺激呈现间隔(SOA)。在检测阈值SOA下呈现的启动词对重复目标和语义相关目标产生了相同程度的促进作用:分别为26毫秒和24毫秒。实验2通过语义判断来确定SOA。在语义阈值SOA的70%时呈现启动词以模拟实验1的暴露条件,此时对重复目标产生了稍大的促进作用,但对语义相关目标有抑制趋势:分别为38毫秒和 -6毫秒。这些结果证实了达根巴赫、卡尔和威廉姆森(1989年)的报告,即阈值设定任务所引发的策略会影响掩蔽启动。此外,实验2提出了一种将弱激活的语义代码检索到意识中的机制,该机制依赖中心-外周原则来增强对所需代码的激活,并抑制语义网络中附近存储的相关代码。