Lane J B
Percept Mot Skills. 1977 Oct;45(2):363-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1977.45.2.363.
Difficulties in assessing individual differences in vividness and control of mental imagery hinder understanding of the role of of imagery in various phenomena. This study examined the relationships among the Gordon test of imagery control, the Betts questionnaire on imagery vividness, and a research questionnaire on control of imagery developed for this study. The research questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and scores were more widely distributed than were those on the Gordon test. Correlations among the instruments ranged from .47 to .57, suggesting that vividness and control of imagery are not clearly differentiated in practice. Discussion of these results suggests that further empirical work is needed to establish the differential validity of the two constructs.
评估心理意象生动性和可控性方面的个体差异存在困难,这阻碍了我们对意象在各种现象中所起作用的理解。本研究考察了意象控制的戈登测试、贝茨意象生动性问卷以及为本研究编制的意象控制研究问卷之间的关系。该研究问卷显示出令人满意的内部一致性,且分数分布比戈登测试更为广泛。这些工具之间的相关性在0.47至0.57之间,这表明在实际应用中,意象的生动性和可控性并没有明显区分开来。对这些结果的讨论表明,需要进一步开展实证研究来确定这两个构念的区分效度。