Soifer Luis Oscar, Peralta Daniel, Dima Guillermo, Besasso Horacio
Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, Center for Medical Education and Clinical Research Norberto Quirno, CEMIC, CEMIC University Institute, IUC Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2010 Dec;40(4):323-7.
Patients with intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) are usually treated with different antibiotics. Certain probiotics have proved to be clinically effective in patients with abdominal distension.
To compare the short-term clinical efficacy of metronidazol vs. a probiotic in patients with SIBO and functional chronic abdominal distension. Patients and methods. This was a randomized prospective pilot study. The study population consisted of 50 patients with chronic abdominal distension (Rome III criteria) and diagnosis of SIBO made by a lactulose H2 breath test. Patients were consecutively randomized to receive either metronidazol or a probiotic. The metronidazol group consisted of 25 subjects (23 women, median age 49 +/- 19 years old), who received metronidazol (Flagyl), 500 mg bid for 5 days. The probiotic group consisted of 25 subjects (20 women, median age 58 +/- 19 years old). The probiotic administered to the latter group contained Lactobacillus casei (3.3 x 10(7) UFC), Lactobacillus plantarum (3.3 x 10(7) UFC), Streptococcus faecalis (3.3 x 10(7) UFC) and Bifidobacterium brevis (1.0 x 10(6) UFC) (Bioflora) and 5 ml bid were administered for 5 days. Both groups went on the same diet, which consisted in reduced consumption of alcohol, legumes, dairy products and leafy green vegetables. Response to treatment was assessed by an independent questioner 15 days post treatment. A five-level overall response questionnaire was used. Responses included much better, better, the same, worse, and much worse. Better and much better were considered positive responses.
Thirteen (52%) subjects receiving metronidazol and 20 (82%) receiving the probiotic referred clinical improvement after the treatment. A statistically significant difference favoured the use of the probiotic (P = 0.036). All the study patients completed treatment. No adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were observed.
Based on this pilot study results, we can suggest that the probiotic herein used has a higher efficacy than metronidazol in the early clinical response of patients with chronic abdominal distension and SIBO.
肠道细菌过度生长(SIBO)患者通常用不同的抗生素进行治疗。某些益生菌已被证明对腹胀患者具有临床疗效。
比较甲硝唑与益生菌对SIBO和功能性慢性腹胀患者的短期临床疗效。患者与方法。这是一项随机前瞻性试验研究。研究人群包括50例慢性腹胀患者(符合罗马III标准),通过乳果糖H2呼气试验诊断为SIBO。患者被连续随机分为接受甲硝唑或益生菌治疗。甲硝唑组由25名受试者组成(23名女性,中位年龄49±19岁),他们接受甲硝唑(灭滴灵),500毫克,每日两次,共5天。益生菌组由25名受试者组成(20名女性,中位年龄58±19岁)。给予后一组的益生菌包含干酪乳杆菌(3.3×10⁷CFU)、植物乳杆菌(3.3×10⁷CFU)、粪肠球菌(3.3×10⁷CFU)和短双歧杆菌(1.0×10⁶CFU)(Bioflora),每日两次,每次5毫升,共服用5天。两组采用相同的饮食,包括减少酒精、豆类、乳制品和绿叶蔬菜的摄入量。治疗后15天由独立的询问者评估治疗反应。使用五级总体反应问卷。反应包括好多了、好转、相同、变差和差得多。好转和好多了被视为阳性反应。
接受甲硝唑治疗的13名(52%)受试者和接受益生菌治疗的20名(82%)受试者在治疗后称临床症状有所改善。使用益生菌有统计学显著差异(P = 0.036)。所有研究患者均完成治疗。未观察到导致治疗中断的不良事件。
基于这项试验研究结果,我们可以认为本文所用的益生菌在慢性腹胀和SIBO患者的早期临床反应中比甲硝唑具有更高的疗效。