University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Biol Psychol. 2011 May;87(2):209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.017. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
After habituation, participants were first induced into negative vs. positive moods and performed then an attention task with either low vs. high hedonic instrumentality of success. In the high-instrumentality condition participants expected to see a funny movie after success and an unpleasant movie after failure; in the low-instrumentality condition participants expected an unpleasant movie after success and a pleasant movie after failure. Effort-related cardiovascular response (ICG, blood pressure) was assessed during mood inductions and task performance. As predicted by the mood-behavior-model (Gendolla, 2000), responses of cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP) and systolic blood pressure were stronger in the high-instrumentality/negative-mood condition than in the other three cells. Here the high hedonic instrumentality of success justified the high effort that was perceived as necessary in a negative mood. Moreover, the PEP effects indicate that cardiovascular response was driven by beta-adrenergic impact on the heart rather than by vascular adjustments.
在适应之后,参与者首先被诱导进入消极或积极的情绪状态,然后在低或高成功享乐工具性的注意任务中表现。在高工具性条件下,参与者期望在成功后看到一部有趣的电影,在失败后看到一部不愉快的电影;在低工具性条件下,参与者期望在成功后看到一部不愉快的电影,在失败后看到一部愉快的电影。在情绪诱导和任务表现期间评估了与努力相关的心血管反应(ICG,血压)。正如情绪-行为模型(Gendolla,2000)所预测的,心脏射前期(PEP)和收缩压的反应在高工具性/消极情绪条件下强于其他三个条件。在这里,成功的高享乐工具性证明了在消极情绪中感知到的高努力是合理的。此外,PEP 效应表明心血管反应是由心脏上的β-肾上腺素能对心脏的影响驱动的,而不是由血管调节驱动的。