Can scientific quality be quantified?
作者信息
Loscalzo Joseph
出版信息
Circulation. 2011 Mar 8;123(9):947-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.020529.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Can scientific quality be quantified?科学质量可以量化吗？
Circulation. 2011 Mar 8;123(9):947-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.020529.
2
Peer review--the newcomers' perspective.同行评审——新人视角
PLoS Biol. 2005 Sep;3(9):e326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030326. Epub 2005 Sep 13.
3
The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.神经科学同行评审联盟
Eur Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;24(2):69-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.01.004.
4
No ghosts here please.这里请勿闹鬼。
Pract Neurol. 2007 Apr;7(2):72-3.
5
[From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion].[源自考克兰图书馆：同行评审的使用仍在讨论中]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Apr 19;152(16):934-7.
6
How do we ensure 'high quality' clinical research?我们如何确保“高质量”的临床研究？
Contraception. 2005 Aug;72(2):83-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.04.010.
7
[Result-based financing of medical research].基于结果的医学研究融资
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Mar 26;129(7):638-41. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.08.0362.
8
[Evaluation of social relevance of applied health research: a rough indicator may be the significance of publishing in national professional journals].[应用健康研究的社会相关性评估：一个粗略指标可能是在国家专业期刊上发表文章的重要性]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Jun 10;144(24):1178-83.
9
Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.早期职业精神科医生的同行评审视角。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;70(11):1599. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09com05624whi.
10
Is the journal impact factor a valid indicator of scientific value?期刊影响因子是科学价值的有效指标吗？
Singapore Med J. 2009 Aug;50(8):749-51.
引用本文的文献
1
A bibliometric analysis of autophagy in atherosclerosis from 2012 to 2021.2012年至2021年动脉粥样硬化中自噬的文献计量分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 15;13:977870. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.977870. eCollection 2022.
2
Categorizing biomedical research: the basics of translation.生物医学研究的分类：转化的基础
FASEB J. 2017 Aug;31(8):3210-3215. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700303R.
3
Journal impact factor: holy grail?期刊影响因子：圣杯？
Neth Heart J. 2012 Oct;20(10):385-6. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0317-3.
4
A review of the Journal of Investigative Dermatology's most cited publications over the past 25 years and the use of developing bibliometric methodologies to assess journal quality.回顾《调查性皮肤病学杂志》过去 25 年最具引用价值的出版物，以及使用发展中的文献计量学方法评估期刊质量。
J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Mar;132(3 Pt 2):1050-60. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.391.
5
Patenting and the gender gap: should women be encouraged to patent more?专利与性别差距：是否应该鼓励女性申请更多专利？
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):491-504. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9344-5. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
Zotero 插件