Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J Exp Bot. 2011 Jun;62(10):3489-99. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err038. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
Day respiration (R(d)) is an important parameter in leaf ecophysiology. It is difficult to measure directly and is indirectly estimated from gas exchange (GE) measurements of the net photosynthetic rate (A), commonly using the Laisk method or the Kok method. Recently a new method was proposed to estimate R(d) indirectly from combined GE and chlorophyll fluorescence (CF) measurements across a range of low irradiances. Here this method is tested for estimating R(d) in five C(3) and one C(4) crop species. Values estimated by this new method agreed with those by the Laisk method for the C(3) species. The Laisk method, however, is only valid for C(3) species and requires measurements at very low CO(2) levels. In contrast, the new method can be applied to both C(3) and C(4) plants and at any CO(2) level. The R(d) estimates by the new method were consistently somewhat higher than those by the Kok method, because using CF data corrects for errors due to any non-linearity between A and irradiance of the used data range. Like the Kok and Laisk methods, the new method is based on the assumption that R(d) varies little with light intensity, which is still subject to debate. Theoretically, the new method, like the Kok method, works best for non-photorespiratory conditions. As CF information is required, data for the new method are usually collected using a small leaf chamber, whereas the Kok and Laisk methods use only GE data, allowing the use of a larger chamber to reduce the noise-to-signal ratio of GE measurements.
日呼吸(R(d))是叶片生理生态学中的一个重要参数。它很难直接测量,通常通过对净光合速率(A)的气体交换(GE)测量,使用 Laisk 法或 Kok 法进行间接估算。最近,提出了一种新的方法,通过在一系列低辐照度下对 GE 和叶绿素荧光(CF)测量值的组合来间接估算 R(d)。在这里,该方法在五种 C(3)和一种 C(4)作物物种中进行了测试。该新方法估算的 R(d)值与 C(3)物种的 Laisk 法估算值一致。然而,Laisk 法仅适用于 C(3)物种,并且需要在非常低的 CO(2)水平下进行测量。相比之下,新方法可应用于 C(3)和 C(4)植物,并且可以在任何 CO(2)水平下使用。新方法估算的 R(d)值始终略高于 Kok 法,因为使用 CF 数据可以纠正由于所用数据范围中 A 和辐照度之间的任何非线性引起的误差。与 Kok 和 Laisk 方法一样,新方法基于 R(d)随光强度变化很小的假设,这仍然存在争议。从理论上讲,新方法与 Kok 法一样,在非光呼吸条件下效果最佳。由于需要 CF 信息,因此通常使用小型叶室收集新方法的数据,而 Kok 和 Laisk 方法仅使用 GE 数据,这允许使用更大的腔室来降低 GE 测量的噪声与信号比。