Suppr超能文献

经骶神经刺激治疗失败的粪便失禁患者的结局和处理。

Outcome and management of patients in whom sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence failed.

机构信息

Clinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, University Hospital of Nantes - Hotel Dieu, Nantes, France.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Apr;54(4):425-32. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318200f866.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacral nerve stimulation fails in 30% to 50% of patients, the outcome that remains largely unreported.

OBJECTIVE

We report on the management and outcome of this cohort of patients.

DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS

Ninety-one patients (88 females) with fecal incontinence, median age 63 years (range, 37-81), were candidates for sacral nerve stimulation. The follow-up protocol comprised incontinence and quality-of-life scores.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Failure was defined on an intention-to-treat basis: after the test (<50% decrease of fecal incontinence episodes) or after permanent implantation (Wexner score >8). Subsequent management and functional results were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean Wexner score for the cohort decreased from 14.3 at baseline to 7.6 after a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 11-69). Sixty-one (67.0%) patients were implanted with a permanent pacemaker; 36 (39.6%) achieved success (group 1). Failure after permanent implantation occurred in 25 (27.5%) patients after a mean of 34.5 months (group 2). Failure after the test occurred in 30 (33.0%) patients, 12 of whom underwent further surgery (group 3) (including stoma, 2; anal reconstruction, 9; and rectopexy, 1), whereas the remainder chose conservative treatment (group 4). At the end of follow-up, group 1 had significantly lower Wexner scores compared with the rest (P < .0001) and superior Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores compared with groups 2 and 4 (P < .0001). Group 3 achieved a greater reduction in Wexner scores compared with groups 2 and 4 (P = .04), although the improvement in Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores did not reach statistical significance.

LIMITATIONS

This was a nonrandomized study with retrospective stratification of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

On an intention-to-treat basis, success can be achieved in up to 40% of patients undergoing sacral nerve stimulation. In those in whom sacral nerve stimulation fails, further surgical treatment can yield favorable results in adequately motivated patients.

摘要

背景

骶神经刺激在 30%至 50%的患者中失败,其结果在很大程度上仍未得到报告。

目的

我们报告了这组患者的治疗和结果。

设计和干预

91 名(88 名女性)患有粪便失禁的患者,中位年龄 63 岁(范围,37-81 岁),是骶神经刺激的候选者。随访方案包括失禁和生活质量评分。

主要观察指标

以意向治疗为基础定义失败:测试后(粪便失禁发作减少<50%)或永久植入后(Wexner 评分>8)。随后记录了管理和功能结果。

结果

该队列的平均 Wexner 评分从基线时的 14.3 分降至中位数随访 31 个月(范围,11-69)后的 7.6 分。61 名(67.0%)患者植入了永久性起搏器;36 名(39.6%)患者获得成功(第 1 组)。25 名(27.5%)患者在平均 34.5 个月后(第 2 组)出现永久性植入后失败。30 名(33.0%)患者在测试后失败,其中 12 名患者接受了进一步手术(第 3 组)(包括造口术 2 例;肛门重建术 9 例;直肠固定术 1 例),而其余患者选择了保守治疗(第 4 组)。在随访结束时,第 1 组的 Wexner 评分明显低于其他组(P<.0001),并且 Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life 评分明显优于第 2 组和第 4 组(P<.0001)。第 3 组的 Wexner 评分与第 2 组和第 4 组相比有更大的降低(P=.04),尽管 Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life 评分的改善未达到统计学意义。

局限性

这是一项非随机研究,对患者进行了回顾性分层。

结论

在意向治疗的基础上,接受骶神经刺激的患者中多达 40%可以获得成功。在骶神经刺激失败的患者中,进一步的手术治疗可以为有意愿的患者带来良好的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验