Pfeiffer M, Griss P
Orthopädische Klinik der Philipps-Universität Marburg, Zentrum Operative Medizin II.
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1990 Jan-Feb;128(1):51-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039861.
In the follow-up study presented the results of 33 high tibia-osteotomies (Coventry) are compared with 51 oblique lower tibia-osteotomies (Wagner). Both techniques guarantee a safe improvement of function, pain relief, and biomechanic situation of the arthrotic joint. The results are mainly independent of the grade of joint involvement and the age of the patient. The Coventry-osteotomy tends to accentuate femoropatellar arthrotic destruction, while the Wagner-osteotomy does so in 20% fewer cases. The functional improvements of the Wagner-osteotomy are more than 20% better, up to 5 years postoperatively, when compared with the high tibia-osteotomy. Indication, technical performance of the operation, and the postoperative care are discussed in the light of the results presented.
在后续研究中,对33例高位胫骨截骨术(考文垂法)的结果与51例胫骨下段斜行截骨术(瓦格纳法)的结果进行了比较。两种技术都能确保关节功能、疼痛缓解及生物力学状况的安全改善。结果主要与关节受累程度及患者年龄无关。考文垂截骨术往往会加重髌股关节的关节破坏,而瓦格纳截骨术出现这种情况的病例少20%。与高位胫骨截骨术相比,瓦格纳截骨术在术后长达5年的时间里功能改善超过20%。根据所呈现的结果对手术指征、技术操作及术后护理进行了讨论。