Suppr超能文献

使用 PedsQLTM 3.0 哮喘模块获得与 PROMIS 儿童哮喘影响量表 (PAIS) 可比的分数。

Using the PedsQL™ 3.0 asthma module to obtain scores comparable with those of the PROMIS pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS).

机构信息

Department of Psychology, CB# 3270, Davie Hall, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2011 Nov;20(9):1497-505. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9874-y. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Institutes of Health's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has developed several scales measuring symptoms and function for use by the clinical research community. One advantage of PROMIS is the ability to link other scales to the PROMIS metric.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this research are to provide evidence of validity for one of the PROMIS measures, the Pediatric Asthma Impact Scale (PAIS), and to link the PedsQL™ Asthma Symptoms Scale with the metric of the PAIS.

METHODS

Descriptive statistics were computed describing the relationships among scores on the PAIS, the PedsQL™ Asthma Symptoms, Treatment, Worry, and Communication Scales, and the DISABKIDS Asthma Impact and Worry Scales for approximately 300 children ages 8-17. A novel linkage method based on item response theory (IRT), calibrated projection, was used to link scores on the PedsQL™ Asthma Symptoms Scale with the metric of the PAIS.

RESULTS

The PAIS exhibited strong convergent validity with the PedsQL™ Asthma Symptoms Scale, and less strong relations with the other five scales. The linkage system uses scores on the PedsQL™ Asthma Symptoms Scale to produce relatively precise score estimates on the metric of the PAIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study provide evidence for the validity of the PAIS, and a method to use scores on the PedsQL™ Asthma Symptoms Scale to estimate scores on the metric of the PAIS, in partial fulfillment of the PROMIS goal to provide a lingua franca for health-related quality of life.

摘要

背景

美国国立卫生研究院的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)开发了几种用于临床研究界的衡量症状和功能的量表。PROMIS 的一个优势是能够将其他量表与 PROMIS 度量标准联系起来。

目的

本研究的目的是为 PROMIS 测量之一,即儿科哮喘影响量表(PAIS)提供有效性证据,并将 PedsQL™哮喘症状量表与 PAIS 的度量标准联系起来。

方法

计算描述 PAIS、PedsQL™哮喘症状、治疗、担忧和沟通量表以及 DISABKIDS 哮喘影响和担忧量表之间分数关系的描述性统计数据,约有 300 名 8-17 岁的儿童。使用基于项目反应理论(IRT)的新链接方法,校准投影,将 PedsQL™哮喘症状量表的分数与 PAIS 的度量标准联系起来。

结果

PAIS 与 PedsQL™哮喘症状量表具有较强的收敛效度,与其他五个量表的关系较弱。链接系统使用 PedsQL™哮喘症状量表的分数来生成 PAIS 度量标准上相对精确的分数估计值。

结论

本研究的结果为 PAIS 的有效性提供了证据,并提供了一种使用 PedsQL™哮喘症状量表的分数来估计 PAIS 度量标准上分数的方法,部分满足了 PROMIS 提供与健康相关的生活质量通用语言的目标。

相似文献

1
Using the PedsQL™ 3.0 asthma module to obtain scores comparable with those of the PROMIS pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS).
Qual Life Res. 2011 Nov;20(9):1497-505. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9874-y. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
3
The PedsQL: reliability and validity of the short-form generic core scales and Asthma Module.
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):256-65. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00008.
7
Validity and reliability of the French version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ brain tumor module.
Qual Life Res. 2021 Aug;30(8):2387-2404. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02815-3. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
9
The PedsQL Family Impact Module: preliminary reliability and validity.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Sep 27;2:55. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-55.

引用本文的文献

2
Characterizing Sampling Variability for Item Response Theory Scale Scores in a Fixed-Parameter Calibrated Projection Design.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Sep;46(6):509-528. doi: 10.1177/01466216221108136. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
3
Linking the RCADS-25 to the PROMIS pediatric item banks Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in a general Dutch population sample.
Qual Life Res. 2022 May;31(5):1587-1595. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03050-6. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
PROsetta: An Package for Linking Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jul;45(5):386-388. doi: 10.1177/01466216211013106. Epub 2021 May 20.
5
Linking Scores with Patient-Reported Health Outcome Instruments:A VALIDATION STUDY AND COMPARISON OF THREE LINKING METHODS.
Psychometrika. 2021 Sep;86(3):717-746. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09776-z. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
7
Linking Oswestry Disability Index to the PROMIS pain interference CAT with equipercentile methods.
Spine J. 2021 Jul;21(7):1185-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
Developing and evaluating ASTHMAXcel adventures: A novel gamified mobile application for pediatric patients with asthma.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Nov;125(5):581-588. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
9
Assessment of pediatric asthma exacerbation with the use of new PROMIS measures.
J Asthma. 2021 Oct;58(10):1298-1306. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1786114. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
10
Restricted Recalibration of Item Response Theory Models.
Psychometrika. 2019 Jun;84(2):529-553. doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09667-4. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

2
PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference Scale: an item response theory analysis of the pediatric pain item bank.
J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
4
An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales.
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):595-607. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9619-3. Epub 2010 Mar 7.
5
Sampling plan and patient characteristics of the PROMIS pediatrics large-scale survey.
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):585-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9618-4. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
7
The use of focus groups in the development of the PROMIS pediatrics item bank.
Qual Life Res. 2008 Jun;17(5):725-35. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9338-1. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
9
Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review.
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S12-21. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2.
10
Equating EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G scores and its use in oncological research.
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Dec;42(18):3169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Oct 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验