Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium.
Liver Transpl. 2011 Jul;17(7):836-48. doi: 10.1002/lt.22295.
The portal vein flow (PVF), portal vein pressure (PVP), and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were prospectively assessed to explore their relationships and to better define hyperflow and portal hypertension (PHT) during liver transplantation (LT). Eighty-one LT procedures were analyzed. No correlation between PVF and PVP was observed. Increases in the central venous pressure (CVP) were transmitted to the PVP (58%, range = 25%-91%, P = 0.001). Severe PHT (HVPG ≥ 15 mm Hg) showed a significant reciprocal association with high PVF (P = 0.023) and lower graft survival (P = 0.04). According to this initial experience, an HVPG value ≥ 15 mm Hg is a promising tool for the evaluation of hemodynamic stress potentially influencing outcomes. An algorithm for graft inflow modulation based on flows, gradients, and systemic hemodynamics is provided. In conclusion, the evaluation of PHT severity with PVP could be delusive because of the influence of CVP. PVF and PVP do not correlate and should not be used individually to assess hyperflow and PHT during LT.
门静脉血流(PVF)、门静脉压力(PVP)和肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)被前瞻性评估,以探讨它们之间的关系,并在肝移植(LT)期间更好地定义高流量和门静脉高压(PHT)。分析了 81 例 LT 手术。PVF 与 PVP 之间没有相关性。中心静脉压(CVP)的增加会传递到 PVP(58%,范围=25%-91%,P=0.001)。严重的 PHT(HVPG≥15mmHg)与高 PVF(P=0.023)和较低的移植物存活率(P=0.04)呈显著的相互关联。根据这一初步经验,HVPG 值≥15mmHg 是评估潜在影响结果的血流动力学应激的有前途的工具。提供了一种基于流量、梯度和全身血液动力学的移植物流入调节算法。总之,由于 CVP 的影响,使用 PVP 评估 PHT 严重程度可能具有欺骗性。PVF 和 PVP 之间没有相关性,不应单独用于评估 LT 期间的高流量和 PHT。