Horder Tim J, Presley Robert, Slípka Jaroslav
Department of Histology and Embryology, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Acta Univ Carol Med Monogr. 2010;158:1-165.
This review argues for the segmental basis of chordate head organization which, like somite-based segmental organization in the trunk, takes its origin from early mesodermal development. The review builds on, and brings up to date, Goodrich's well-known scheme of head organization. It surveys recent data in support of this scheme and shows how evidence and arguments supposedly in conflict with it can be accommodated. Many of the arguments revolve around matters of methodology; the limitations of older LM, SEM (on which the concept of "somitomeres" is based) and recent molecular evidence (which has sometimes been seen as allocating the central role in head organization to the CNS and the neural crest) are highlighted and shown to explain a number of claims contrary to Goodrich's. We provide (in Part 2) a new, comparative survey of the best available evidence most directly relevant to the Goodrich Bauplan, with a special emphasis on stem chordates. The postotic region has commonly been seen as segmentally organized: the critical issues concern the preotic region. There are many reasons why Goodrich's three preotic segments may become specialized during evolution and why the underlying initial segmental organization may be overridden in later stages during embryonic development; we refer to a number of these. We conclude that the preotic segmental Bauplan is remarkably conserved and most explicitly demonstrated among stem forms, but we also suggest that the concept of the prechordal plate requires careful reexamination. Central to our overall analysis is the importance of the epigenetic nature of embryogenesis; its implications are made clear. Finally we speculate on evolutionary implications for the origin of the head and its specialized features. The review is intended to serve as a resource giving access to references to a wealth of now neglected, older data on anamniote embryology.
本综述支持脊索动物头部组织的分节基础,该基础与躯干中基于体节的分节组织一样,起源于早期中胚层发育。本综述以古德里奇著名的头部组织模式为基础并进行了更新。它调查了支持该模式的最新数据,并展示了那些看似与之冲突的证据和论据是如何被调和的。许多论据都围绕方法论问题展开;文中强调了旧有光学显微镜、扫描电子显微镜(“体节球”概念即基于此)以及近期分子证据的局限性(后者有时被视为在头部组织中赋予中枢神经系统和神经嵴核心作用),并表明这些局限性解释了一些与古德里奇观点相悖的主张。我们(在第二部分)对与古德里奇模式最直接相关的现有最佳证据进行了新的比较性调查,特别强调了原始脊索动物。耳后区域通常被视为分节组织的:关键问题在于耳前区域。有许多原因可以解释为什么古德里奇的三个耳前节段在进化过程中可能会特化,以及为什么潜在的初始分节组织在胚胎发育后期可能会被覆盖;我们提及了其中一些原因。我们得出结论,耳前分节模式在原始形式中显著保守且最为明确地体现出来,但我们也建议对脊索前板的概念进行仔细重新审视。我们整体分析的核心是胚胎发生的表观遗传性质的重要性;其影响已清晰呈现。最后,我们推测了头部起源及其特化特征的进化意义。本综述旨在作为一种资源,提供对大量现已被忽视的有关无羊膜动物胚胎学的旧有数据的参考文献。