Park Jong Sun, Yim Jae-Joon, Kang Won Jun, Chung June-Key, Yoo Chul-Gyu, Kim Young Whan, Han Sung Koo, Shim Young-Soo, Lee Sang-Min
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Lung Institute of Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Mar 9;4:56. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-56.
Carcinoma of unknown primary tumors (CUP) is present in 0.5%-9% of all patients with malignant neoplasms; only 20%-27% of primary sites are identified before the patients die. Currently, 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron-emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) or PET combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) is widely used for the diagnosis of CUP. However, the diagnostic yield of the primary site varies. The aim of this study was to determine whether PET or PET/CT has additional advantages over the conventional diagnostic workup in detecting the primary origin of CUP.
Twenty patients with unknown primary tumors that underwent PET or PET/CT were included in this study. For all patients, the conventional diagnostic workup was unsuccessful in detecting the primary sites. Among 20 patients, 11 had PET scans. The remaining nine patients had PET/CT. In all 20 patients, neither the PET nor PET/CT identified the primary site of the tumor, including six cases with cervical lymph node metastases. The PET and PET/CT revealed sites of FDG uptake other than those associated with known metastases in seven patients, but these findings did not influence patient management or therapy. Two patients had unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures due to false positive results on the PET or PET/CT.
Although it is inconclusive because of small sample size of the study, the additional value of PET or PET/CT for the detection of primary sites in patients with CUP might be less than expected; especially in patients that have already had extensive conventional diagnostic workups. Further study is needed to confirm this finding.
在所有恶性肿瘤患者中,原发灶不明的肿瘤(CUP)占0.5%-9%;仅20%-27%的原发部位在患者死亡前得以确定。目前,18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(18F-FDG PET)或PET与计算机断层扫描相结合(PET/CT)被广泛用于CUP的诊断。然而,原发部位的诊断率各不相同。本研究的目的是确定PET或PET/CT在检测CUP的原发灶方面是否比传统诊断检查具有额外优势。
本研究纳入了20例接受PET或PET/CT检查的原发灶不明肿瘤患者。对于所有患者,传统诊断检查均未能检测到原发部位。20例患者中,11例进行了PET扫描。其余9例患者进行了PET/CT检查。在所有20例患者中,PET和PET/CT均未确定肿瘤的原发部位,包括6例伴有颈部淋巴结转移的病例。PET和PET/CT在7例患者中显示出除已知转移灶外的FDG摄取部位,但这些发现并未影响患者的管理或治疗。2例患者因PET或PET/CT的假阳性结果接受了不必要的侵入性诊断程序。
尽管由于本研究样本量小,结果尚无定论,但PET或PET/CT在检测CUP患者原发部位方面的附加价值可能低于预期;尤其是在已经进行了广泛传统诊断检查的患者中。需要进一步研究来证实这一发现。