Liu Jianbo, Dyer Robert M, Neerchal Nagaraj K, Tasch Uri, Rajkondawar Parimal G
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland at Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250.
Department of Animal and Food Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19717.
J Dairy Res. 2011 May;78(2):168-77. doi: 10.1017/S0022029911000057. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
The objective of the study was to evaluate the relationship of veterinary clinical assessments of lameness to probability estimates of lameness predicted from vertical kinetic measures. We hypothesized that algorithm-derived probability estimates of lameness would accurately reflect vertical measures in lame limbs even though vertical changes may not inevitably occur in all lameness. Kinetic data were collected from sound (n=179) and unilaterally lame (n=167) dairy cattle with a 1-dimensional, parallel force plate system that registered vertical ground reaction force signatures of all four limbs as cows freely exited the milking parlour. Locomotion was scored for each hind limb using a 1-5 locomotion score system (1=sound, 5=severely lame). Pain response in the interdigital space was quantified with an algometer and pain response in the claw was quantified with a hoof tester fitted with a pressure gage. Lesions were assigned severity scores (1=minimal pathology to 5=severe pathology). Lameness diminished the magnitude of peak ground reaction forces, average ground reaction forces, Fourier transformed ground reaction forces, stance times and vertical impulses in the lame limbs of unilaterally lame cows. The only effect of lameness on the opposite sound limb was increased magnitude of stance times and vertical impulses in unilaterally lame cows. Symmetry measures of the peak ground reaction forces, average ground reaction forces, Fourier transformed ground reaction forces, stance times and vertical impulses between the left and right hind limbs were also affected in unilateral lameness. Paradoxically, limbs with clinically similar lesion and locomotion scores and pain responses were associated with a broad range of load-transfer off the limb. Substantial unloading and changes in the vertical limb variables occurred in some lameness while minimal unloading and changes in vertical limb variables occurred in other lameness. Corresponding probability estimates of lameness accurately reflected changes in the vertical parameters of limbs and generated low probability estimates of lameness when minimal unloading occurred. Failure to transfer load off limbs with pain reactions, locomotion abnormalities and lesions explained much of the limited sensitivity in lameness detection with vertical limb variables.
本研究的目的是评估跛行的兽医临床评估与根据垂直动力学测量预测的跛行概率估计之间的关系。我们假设,即使并非所有跛行情况都会不可避免地出现垂直变化,但算法得出的跛行概率估计仍能准确反映跛行肢体的垂直测量值。使用一维平行力板系统,从健康奶牛(n = 179)和单侧跛行奶牛(n = 167)收集动力学数据,该系统在奶牛自由离开挤奶厅时记录所有四条腿的垂直地面反力特征。使用1 - 5级运动评分系统(1 = 健康,5 = 严重跛行)对每个后肢的运动进行评分。使用痛觉计量化趾间空间的疼痛反应,使用配备压力计的蹄测试仪量化蹄内的疼痛反应。对病变进行严重程度评分(1 = 最小病理到5 = 严重病理)。跛行降低了单侧跛行奶牛跛行肢体的地面反力峰值、平均地面反力、傅里叶变换地面反力、站立时间和垂直冲量的大小。跛行对另一侧健康肢体的唯一影响是单侧跛行奶牛站立时间和垂直冲量大小增加。单侧跛行时,左右后肢之间的地面反力峰值、平均地面反力、傅里叶变换地面反力、站立时间和垂直冲量的对称性测量也受到影响。矛盾的是,临床病变、运动评分和疼痛反应相似的肢体与肢体卸载范围广泛相关。在某些跛行情况下,肢体出现大量卸载和垂直肢体变量变化,而在其他跛行情况下,肢体卸载和垂直肢体变量变化最小。相应的跛行概率估计准确反映了肢体垂直参数的变化,在卸载最小时产生低跛行概率估计。未能将负荷从有疼痛反应、运动异常和病变的肢体上转移出去,解释了使用垂直肢体变量检测跛行时敏感性有限的大部分原因。