Bradtmueller Anna, Nejati Amir, Shepley Elise, Vasseur Elsa
Department of Animal Science, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada.
Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Mar 22;13(6):1121. doi: 10.3390/ani13061121.
Lameness within the dairy industry is a concern because of its associated costs and welfare implications. Visual locomotion scoring has been commonly used for assessing cows' locomotion quality, but it can have low reliability and is relatively subjective compared to automated methods of assessing locomotion. Kinematic, kinetic, and accelerometric technologies can provide a greater number of more detailed outcome measurements than visual scoring. The objective of this systematic review was to determine outcome measurements, and the relationships between them, that have been recorded using kinematic, kinetic, and accelerometric technologies, as well as other approaches to evaluating cow locomotion. Following PRISMA guidelines, two databases were searched for studies published from January 2000 to June 2022. Thirty-seven articles were retained after undergoing a screening process involving a title and abstract evaluation, followed by a full-text assessment. Locomotion measurements recorded using these technologies often overlapped, but inconsistencies in the types of technology, the arrangement of equipment, the terminology, and the measurement-recording approaches made it difficult to compare locomotion measurements across studies. Additional research would contribute to a better understanding of how factors regarding the health, environment, and management of dairy cows affect aspects of locomotion, as recorded through the detailed, objective outcome measurements provided by these technologies.
在乳制品行业中,跛行是一个令人担忧的问题,因为它会带来相关成本并对奶牛福利产生影响。视觉运动评分一直是评估奶牛运动质量的常用方法,但与自动评估运动的方法相比,其可靠性较低且相对主观。运动学、动力学和加速度测量技术能够提供比视觉评分更多、更详细的结果测量。本系统综述的目的是确定使用运动学、动力学和加速度测量技术以及其他评估奶牛运动的方法所记录的结果测量及其之间的关系。按照PRISMA指南,检索了两个数据库中2000年1月至2022年6月发表的研究。经过标题和摘要评估,随后进行全文评估的筛选过程后,保留了37篇文章。使用这些技术记录的运动测量结果常常重叠,但技术类型、设备布置、术语以及测量记录方法的不一致使得跨研究比较运动测量变得困难。进一步的研究将有助于更好地理解奶牛健康、环境和管理等因素如何通过这些技术提供的详细、客观的结果测量来影响运动方面。