Centre for Clinical Interventions, Northbridge, Western Australia, Australia.
Eat Behav. 2011 Apr;12(2):143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
To compare the goodness-of-fit of five models of Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) data, in clinical and community samples.
The EDE-Q was administered to 228 eating disorder patients and 211 non-eating disordered university students. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare the validity of the original four EDE-Q subscales with that of brief one-factor, extended one-factor, two-factor, and three-factor models. Measurement invariance across the two samples was considered.
The only model to provide an acceptable fit to the data was the brief one-factor model consisting of eight Weight and Shape Concern items. Scores on this scale correlated highly with the original EDE-Q subscales.
The reliability of the EDE-Q may be increased if a modified scoring system is used. This complements findings from recent research with the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE).
比较五种饮食障碍问卷(EDE-Q)模型在临床和社区样本中的拟合优度。
对 228 名饮食障碍患者和 211 名非饮食障碍的大学生进行了 EDE-Q 问卷调查。采用验证性因子分析比较了原始的四个 EDE-Q 分量表与简短的单因素、扩展的单因素、双因素和三因素模型的有效性。考虑了两个样本之间的测量不变性。
唯一能够为数据提供可接受拟合的模型是由八个体重和体型担忧项目组成的简短单因素模型。该量表的得分与原始 EDE-Q 分量表高度相关。
如果使用修改后的评分系统,EDE-Q 的可靠性可能会提高。这与最近对饮食障碍检查(EDE)的研究结果相补充。