Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2011 Jul-Aug;19(4):357-61. doi: 10.1002/erv.1068. Epub 2011 Jan 3.
The present study compared the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE; 16.0) and the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q; 6.0) and investigated the psychometric properties of the Norwegian translation of the EDE. Fifty-eight university women aged 19-41 years (mean BMI = 23) were assessed with the EDE and EDE-Q. Satisfactory internal consistency and inter-rater reliability were demonstrated for the Norwegian translation of the EDE. Generally high convergent validity between the EDE and EDE-Q was found, with correlations ranging from 0.60 (Eating Concern) to 0.86 (Weight Concern). Agreement for OBEs and vomiting were excellent, while driven exercising generated lower levels of convergence. Consistent with prior studies, the EDE-Q generated significantly higher levels of psychopathology, although effect sizes were small. Owing to the significantly higher EDE-Q scores, it is ill advised to administer these two instruments interchangeably, as this may fail to produce meaningful data.
本研究比较了饮食障碍检查（EDE；16.0）和饮食障碍检查问卷（EDE-Q；6.0），并调查了 EDE 的挪威语翻译的心理测量特性。58 名年龄在 19-41 岁的（平均 BMI=23）大学女性接受了 EDE 和 EDE-Q 的评估。挪威语 EDE 的内部一致性和评分者间信度均令人满意。EDE 和 EDE-Q 之间具有较高的收敛效度，相关性范围从 0.60（进食关注）到 0.86（体重关注）。OBE 和呕吐的一致性非常好，而强迫运动的一致性较低。与先前的研究一致，EDE-Q 产生了显著更高水平的精神病理学，尽管效应量较小。由于 EDE-Q 的得分显著更高，因此不建议这两种工具互换使用，因为这可能无法产生有意义的数据。
