Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Life Sciences Institute, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
J Cell Sci. 2011 Apr 1;124(Pt 7):1167-74. doi: 10.1242/jcs.080929. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
Standard local control theory, which describes Ca(2+) release during excitation-contraction coupling (ECC), assumes that all ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2) complexes are equivalent. Findings from our laboratory have called this assumption into question. Specifically, we have shown that the RyR2 complexes in ventricular myocytes are different, depending on their location within the cell. This has led us to hypothesize that similar differences occur within the rat atrial cell. To test this hypothesis, we have triple-labelled enzymatically isolated fixed myocytes to examine the distribution and colocalization of RyR2, calsequestrin (Casq), voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels (Ca(v)1.2), the sodium-calcium exchanger (Ncx) and caveolin-3 (Cav3). A number of different surface RyR2 populations were identified, and one of these groups, in which RyR2, Ca(v)1.2 and Ncx colocalized, might provide the structural basis for 'eager' sites of Ca(2+) release in atria. A small percentage of the dyads containing RyR2 and Ca(v)1.2 were colocalized with Cav3, and therefore could be influenced by the signalling molecules it anchors. The majority of the RyR2 clusters were tightly linked to Ca(v)1.2, and, whereas some were coupled to both Ca 1.2 and Ncx, none were with Ncx alone. This suggests that Ca(v)1.2-mediated Ca(2+) -induced Ca(2+) release is the primary method of ECC. The two molecules studied that were found in the interior of atrial cells, RyR2 and Casq, showed significantly less colocalization and a reduced nearest-neighbour distance in the interior, compared with the surface of the cell. These differences might result in a higher excitability for RyR2 in the interior of the cells, facilitating the spread of excitation from the periphery to the centre. We also present morphometric data for all of the molecules studied, as well as for those colocalizations found to be significant.
标准的局部控制理论描述了兴奋-收缩偶联(ECC)期间的 Ca(2+)释放,该理论假设所有的 Ryanodine 受体 2(RyR2)复合物都是等效的。我们实验室的研究结果对这一假设提出了质疑。具体来说,我们已经表明,心室肌细胞中的 RyR2 复合物因其在细胞内的位置不同而有所不同。这使我们假设在大鼠心房细胞中也存在类似的差异。为了验证这一假设,我们使用三重标记酶分离的固定心肌细胞来研究 RyR2、Calsequestrin(Casq)、电压门控 Ca(2+)通道(Ca(v)1.2)、钠钙交换体(Ncx)和 Caveolin-3(Cav3)的分布和共定位。鉴定出许多不同的表面 RyR2 群体,其中一个群体中 RyR2、Ca(v)1.2 和 Ncx 共定位,可能为心房中 Ca(2+)释放的“活跃”部位提供结构基础。含有 RyR2 和 Ca(v)1.2 的二联体的一小部分与 Cav3 共定位,因此可能受其锚定的信号分子的影响。大多数 RyR2 簇与 Ca(v)1.2 紧密相连,其中一些与 Ca 1.2 和 Ncx 均相连,而没有与 Ncx 单独相连。这表明 Ca(v)1.2 介导的 Ca(2+)诱导的 Ca(2+)释放是 ECC 的主要方式。在心房细胞内部发现的两种研究分子,RyR2 和 Casq,与细胞表面相比,其共定位明显减少,最近邻距离也减小。这些差异可能导致细胞内部 RyR2 的兴奋性更高,从而促进兴奋从周围向中心传播。我们还提供了所有研究分子的形态计量学数据,以及发现有显著共定位的那些数据。