• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据Clavien-Dindo分类法评估胰体尾切除术后的并发症。

Assessment of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after distal pancreatectomy.

作者信息

Casadei Riccardo, Ricci Claudio, Pezzilli Raffaele, Calculli Lucia, D'Ambra Marielda, Taffurelli Giovanni, Minni Francesco

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of di Bologna, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital. Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

JOP. 2011 Mar 9;12(2):126-30.

PMID:21386637
Abstract

CONTEXT

The absence of a definition and a widely accepted ranking system to classify surgical complications has hampered proper interpretation of the surgical outcome.

PATIENTS

Sixty-one patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification; each grade was evaluated regarding the length of the postoperative stay and was compared to the most important complications.

RESULTS

Thirty (49.2%) patients had no complications; out of the thirty-one (50.8%) patients with complications, 9 (14.5%) had grade I, 15 (24.6%) had grade II, 6 (9.8%) had grade III, and 1 (1.6%) had grade IV. There were no postoperative deaths (grade V). A progressive increase in the length of hospitalization from patients with no complications to those having grade IV (P < 0.001) was noted. Postoperative pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage rates did not significantly increase from Clavien-Dindo grade I to grade IV (P = 0.118 and P = 0.226, respectively). The severity of a postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, instead, was positively related to the grade of the Clavien-Dindo classification (P = 0.049) while postoperative pancreatic fistula resulted near the significant value (P = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

The Clavien-Dindo classification is a simple way of reporting all complications following distal pancreatectomy. It allows us to distinguish a normal postoperative course from any deviation and the severity of complications and it may be useful for comparing postoperative morbidity between different pancreatic centers.

摘要

背景

缺乏对外科手术并发症进行分类的定义和广泛接受的分级系统,阻碍了对手术结果的正确解读。

患者

61例行胰体尾切除术的患者。

主要观察指标

并发症按照Clavien-Dindo分级系统进行分类;评估各分级的术后住院时间,并与最重要的并发症进行比较。

结果

30例(49.2%)患者无并发症;在31例(50.8%)有并发症的患者中,9例(14.5%)为Ⅰ级,15例(24.6%)为Ⅱ级,6例(9.8%)为Ⅲ级,1例(1.6%)为Ⅳ级。无术后死亡(Ⅴ级)病例。观察到从无并发症患者到Ⅳ级患者,住院时间呈逐渐增加趋势(P<0.001)。从Clavien-DindoⅠ级到Ⅳ级,术后胰瘘和胰体尾切除术后出血发生率未显著增加(分别为P = 0.118和P = 0.226)。相反,胰体尾切除术后出血的严重程度与Clavien-Dindo分级呈正相关(P = 0.049),而术后胰瘘接近显著值(P = 0.058)。

结论

Clavien-Dindo分级是报告胰体尾切除术后所有并发症的一种简单方法。它使我们能够区分正常的术后过程与任何偏差以及并发症的严重程度,并且可能有助于比较不同胰腺中心之间的术后发病率。

相似文献

1
Assessment of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after distal pancreatectomy.根据Clavien-Dindo分类法评估胰体尾切除术后的并发症。
JOP. 2011 Mar 9;12(2):126-30.
2
Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰腺手术后并发症的评估:一种应用于633例行胰十二指肠切除术患者的新型分级系统。
Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):931-7; discussion 937-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a.
3
Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution.对232例连续性远端胰腺切除术的批判性评估:重点关注危险因素、手术结果及术后胰瘘的处理——一家机构21年的经验
Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):956-65. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.10.956.
4
Morbidity and mortality after distal pancreatectomy for trauma: a critical appraisal of 107 consecutive patients undergoing resection at a Level 1 Trauma Centre.创伤性胰体尾切除术后的发病率和死亡率:对一家一级创伤中心连续107例行切除术患者的批判性评估。
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1401-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.024. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
5
Late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: is it possible to recognize risk factors?胰十二指肠切除术后晚期胰十二指肠切除术后出血:能否识别危险因素?
JOP. 2012 Mar 10;13(2):193-8.
6
The usefulness of a grading system for complications resulting from pancreatic resections: a single center experience.胰腺切除术并发症分级系统的实用性:单中心经验。
Updates Surg. 2011 Jun;63(2):97-102. doi: 10.1007/s13304-011-0073-8. Epub 2011 May 3.
7
Interobserver variability of Clavien-Dindo scoring in urology.泌尿外科中Clavien-Dindo评分的观察者间变异性
Int J Urol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1274-8. doi: 10.1111/iju.12576. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
8
Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery.胸外科术后发病率和死亡率的系统分类。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;90(3):936-42; discussion 942. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.014.
9
Pancreatogastrostomy as a salvage procedure to treat severe postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.胰胃吻合术作为一种挽救性手术用于治疗胰十二指肠切除术后严重的术后胰瘘。
Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):966-70; discussion 971. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.10.966.
10
Central pancreatectomy: comparison of results according to the type of anastomosis.胰体中部切除术:吻合类型的结果比较。
J Visc Surg. 2012 Apr;149(2):e153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduction of Postoperative Complications in Pancreatic Surgery by Standardizing Perioperative Management: An Observational Cohort Study.通过规范围手术期管理降低胰腺手术术后并发症:一项观察性队列研究
Visc Med. 2024 Aug;40(4):184-193. doi: 10.1159/000539688. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
2
Converted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is there an impact on patient outcome and total cost?转化性腹腔镜胰体尾切除术:对患者结局和总费用有影响吗?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Jun;407(4):1499-1506. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02427-y. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
3
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single centre propensity score matching analysis.
腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术的比较:单中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1747-1755. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01039-x. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
4
External validation of nomogram for predicting malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN): from the theory to the clinical practice using the decision curve analysis model.基于决策曲线分析模型的预测恶性管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)的列线图的外部验证:从理论到临床实践。
Updates Surg. 2021 Apr;73(2):429-438. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-00999-4. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
The Usefulness of a Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting the Probability of Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single-Center Experience.术前列线图预测腹腔镜向开腹远端胰腺切除术转化概率的有用性:单中心经验。
World J Surg. 2021 Jan;45(1):252-260. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05806-6. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
The influence of nutritional status on the incidence of postoperative complications in patients following distal pancreatectomy.营养状况对胰体尾切除术后患者术后并发症发生率的影响。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2020;15(1):65-75. doi: 10.5114/pg.2019.86806. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
7
Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification System in Assessing Head and Neck Surgery Complications.克莱维恩-迪诺分类系统在评估头颈外科手术并发症中的应用。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Mar;72(1):24-29. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01718-7. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
8
Predictive Nomogram for Early Recurrence after Pancreatectomy in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Risk Classification Using Preoperative Clinicopathologic Factors.可切除胰腺癌胰十二指肠切除术后早期复发的预测列线图:利用术前临床病理因素进行风险分类
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jan 6;12(1):137. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010137.
9
Risk Factors of Intraoperative Dysglycemia in Elderly Surgical Patients.老年手术患者术中血糖异常的危险因素。
Int J Med Sci. 2019 May 10;16(5):665-674. doi: 10.7150/ijms.32971. eCollection 2019.
10
Logistical factors associated with adverse outcomes following emergency surgery in an acute care surgical unit.与急性外科重症监护病房急诊手术后不良结局相关的后勤因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):377-382. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-01064-3. Epub 2019 Jan 7.