In-hospital outcomes of very elderly patients (85 years and older) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE

To compare in-hospital outcomes of a large cohort of very elderly patients (age ≥ 85 years) with younger patients (age < 85 years) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for all indications at our institution.

BACKGROUND

Interventionist cardiologists are often reluctant to undertake PCI in very elderly patients due to the perception of poor outcome in this high-risk cohort. However, the prognostic significance of advanced age itself is not clear.

METHODS

Baseline clinical, angiographic and procedural variables, and in-hospital outcome data were entered into a prospective registry of 17,572 consecutive patients undergoing PCI at the University Health Network between April 2000 and December 2008. Patients were stratified according to age (< 85 years, n = 17,168, or ≥ 85 years, n = 404) and in-hospital mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and complication rates were calculated. Logistic regression-analysis identified independent predictors of unadjusted mortality and MACE. Very elderly patients were propensity matched with younger patients (1:2 ratio), and the analysis repeated.

RESULTS

Very elderly patients had a mean age of 87.5 ± 2.9 (range, 85-97 years) vs. 62.8 ± 11.1 years for the younger cohort and had a greater number of comorbid conditions. This cohort were more likely to present as an urgent or primary PCI, underwent more complex interventions, and achieved less angiographic success. Unadjusted mortality and post procedure myocardial infarction were significantly higher in very elderly patients (6.93% vs. 1.20%, P < 0.0001 and 4.46% vs. 2.74%, P = 0.04). Renal, neurological, and access-site complications were all greater in the very elderly cohort. Although age ≥ 85 years was a significant independent predictor of both mortality (OR, 2.62; CI, 1.44-4.78, P = 0.0016) and MACE (OR, 1.94; CI, 1.25-3.01, P = 0.003), other variables such as cardiogenic shock were more potent predictors of adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Very elderly patients represent a high-risk cohort, with significantly increased in-hospital mortality and complication rates after PCI. Death occurred predominantly in very elderly patients undergoing nonelective PCI. Decisions to proceed with PCI in very elderly patients should be based on other prognostic variables in combination with advanced age, and these patients should not be excluded from revascularization based on age alone.