• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院医师助理模式与传统住院医师模式提供的一般医疗住院护理结果比较。

A comparison of outcomes of general medical inpatient care provided by a hospitalist-physician assistant model vs a traditional resident-based model.

机构信息

Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2011 Mar;6(3):122-30. doi: 10.1002/jhm.826.

DOI:10.1002/jhm.826
PMID:21387547
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Residency reform in the form of work hour restrictions has forced academic medical centers to develop alternate models of care to provide inpatient care. One such model is the use of physician assistants (PAs) with hospitalists. However, these models of care have not been widely evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of inpatient care provided by a hospitalist-PA (H-PA) model with the traditional resident based model.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 9681 general medical (GM) hospitalizations between January 2005 and December 2006 using a hospital administrative database. We used multivariable mixed models to adjust for a wide variety of potential confounders and account for multiple patient visits to the hospital to compare the outcomes of 2171 hospitalizations to H-PA teams with those of 7510 hospitalizations to resident teams (RES).

MEASUREMENTS

Length of stay (LOS), charges, readmission within 7, 14, and 30 days and inpatient mortality.

RESULTS

Inpatient care provided by H-PA teams was associated with a 6.73% longer LOS (P = 0.005) but charges, risk of readmission at 7, 14, and 30 days and inpatient mortality were similar to resident-based teams. The increase in LOS was dependent on the time of admission of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

H-PA team-based GM inpatient care was associated with a higher LOS but similar charges, readmission rates, and inpatient mortality to traditional resident-based teams, a finding that persisted in sensitivity analyses.

摘要

背景

以工时限制为形式的住院医师规范化培训改革迫使学术医疗中心开发替代的护理模式来提供住院患者的医疗服务。其中一种模式是使用医院医师助理(PAs)与医院医生(hospitalists)合作。然而,这些护理模式尚未得到广泛评估。

目的

比较由医院医生-PA(H-PA)团队提供的住院患者医疗服务与传统住院医师主导模式的结果。

设计、地点和患者:我们使用医院管理数据库对 2005 年 1 月至 2006 年 12 月期间的 9681 例普通内科(GM)住院患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们使用多变量混合模型调整了广泛的潜在混杂因素,并考虑了患者多次住院的情况,以比较 2171 例由 H-PA 团队提供的住院患者与 7510 例由住院医师团队(RES)提供的住院患者的结局。

测量指标

住院时间(LOS)、费用、7、14 和 30 天内的再入院率以及住院内死亡率。

结果

H-PA 团队提供的住院患者医疗服务与 LOS 延长 6.73%相关(P=0.005),但费用、7、14 和 30 天内的再入院风险以及住院内死亡率与住院医师团队相似。LOS 的增加取决于患者入院的时间。

结论

H-PA 团队提供的 GM 住院患者医疗服务与 LOS 延长相关,但与传统住院医师团队相比,费用、再入院率和住院内死亡率相似,这一发现在敏感性分析中仍然存在。

相似文献

1
A comparison of outcomes of general medical inpatient care provided by a hospitalist-physician assistant model vs a traditional resident-based model.医院医师助理模式与传统住院医师模式提供的一般医疗住院护理结果比较。
J Hosp Med. 2011 Mar;6(3):122-30. doi: 10.1002/jhm.826.
2
Implementation of a physician assistant/hospitalist service in an academic medical center: impact on efficiency and patient outcomes.在一所学术医疗中心实施医师助理/住院医师服务:对效率和患者结局的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2008 Sep;3(5):361-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.352.
3
Comparing Hospitalist-Resident to Hospitalist-Midlevel Practitioner Team Performance on Length of Stay and Direct Patient Care Cost.比较住院医师与中级医疗从业者组成的团队在住院时间和直接患者护理成本方面的表现。
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Mar;7(1):65-9. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00234.1.
4
Comparison of Resident, Advanced Practice Clinician, and Hospitalist Teams in an Academic Medical Center: Association With Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization.在学术医疗中心中比较住院医师、高级实践临床医生和医院医生团队:与临床结果和资源利用的关联。
J Hosp Med. 2020 Dec;15(12):709-715. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3475.
5
Comparison of processes and outcomes of pneumonia care between hospitalists and community-based primary care physicians.住院医师与社区基层医疗医生在肺炎治疗过程及结果方面的比较。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Oct;77(10):1053-8. doi: 10.4065/77.10.1053.
6
Bringing generalists into the hospital: outcomes of a family medicine hospitalist model in Singapore.将通科医生引入医院:新加坡家庭医学驻院医师模式的效果。
J Hosp Med. 2011 Mar;6(3):115-21. doi: 10.1002/jhm.821.
7
The effect of a hospitalist comanagement service on vascular surgery inpatients.住院医师共同管理服务对血管外科住院患者的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1550-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
8
Improved survival with hospitalists in a pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房中住院医师的存在改善了患者生存率。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):847-52. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000055376.01875.C3.
9
Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care.医院医师工作量对医疗质量和效率的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):786-93. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.300.
10
Comparison of hospital costs and length of stay for community internists, hospitalists, and academicians.社区内科医生、住院医师和院士的住院费用及住院时间比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):662-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0148-x. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of physician assistants on quality of care: rapid review.医师助理对医疗质量的影响:快速综述
BMJ. 2025 Jul 3;390:e086358. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2025-086358.
2
Comparison of hospitalist service staffing models at Baylor University Medical Center.贝勒大学医学中心住院医师服务人员配备模式的比较
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2023 Dec 20;37(1):70-77. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2023.2260671. eCollection 2024.
3
The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence.医师助理/医师助手的成本效益:国际证据的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 1;16(11):e0259183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259183. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparison of the Outcome of Patient Management with Physician Extenders Only and with both Residents and Extenders.仅由医师助理进行患者管理与由住院医师和医师助理共同进行患者管理的结果比较。
Cureus. 2020 Mar 14;12(3):e7266. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7266.
5
Impact of hospitalists on the efficiency of inpatient care and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.住院医师对住院治疗效率和患者满意度的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2019 Apr 12;9(2):121-134. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2019.1591901. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
The effects of substitution of hospital ward care from medical doctors to physician assistants on non-adherence to guidelines on medication prescribing.由医师助理替代医生提供医院病房护理对药物处方指南遵从性的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202626. eCollection 2018.
7
Association of Hospitalist Years of Experience With Mortality in the Hospitalized Medicare Population.医院医师从业年限与住院 Medicare 人群死亡率的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):196-203. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7049.
8
The impact of the implementation of physician assistants in inpatient care: A multicenter matched-controlled study.医师助理在住院护理中实施的影响:一项多中心配对对照研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0178212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178212. eCollection 2017.
9
The involvement of physician assistants in inpatient care in hospitals in the Netherlands: a cost-effectiveness analysis.荷兰医院中医师助理参与住院护理的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 10;7(7):e016405. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016405.
10
Comments: Response to Iannuzzi et al.评论:对伊安努齐等人的回应
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):689. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00394.1.