• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅由医师助理进行患者管理与由住院医师和医师助理共同进行患者管理的结果比较。

Comparison of the Outcome of Patient Management with Physician Extenders Only and with both Residents and Extenders.

作者信息

White Ted, Burns Bracken, Leonard Matthew, Nwabueze Christian, Quinn Megan

机构信息

Trauma, Ballad Health Medical Group, Johnson City, USA.

Surgery, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Mar 14;12(3):e7266. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7266.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.7266
PMID:32292677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7153817/
Abstract

This was a retrospective study that aimed to determine the treatment outcome of patients seen in the trauma unit of the Johnson City Medical Center (JCMC). The study included 2844 patients in the trauma registry and evaluated age, sex, injury severity score (ISS), length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU), overall hospital lengths of stay (LOS), ventilator days, discharge disposition, and complications between one group managed by extenders only and the second managed by both residents and extenders. The sample size of the two groups was similar (group one = 1446 and group two = 1398) and the proportions of males and females in the two groups were identical (males = 65%, females = 35%). Both groups had similar mechanisms of injury, although group one had a higher percentage of falls (32.9% vs. 22.03%) and group two had a higher proportion of motor vehicle crash (MVC) traumas (40.41% vs 30%). There was no significant difference in those discharged home and deaths between the two groups. (χ(1, N = 2258) = 0.04, p = 0.82). Complications showed statistical significance when looking at extenders vs. residents plus extenders for all complications (χ(7, N = 196) = 38.73, p ≤ 0.0001). It is possible that having extenders only versus both extenders and residents had no significant difference among the patient outcomes based on the variables age, sex, ISS, ICU days, overall hospital LOS, and ventilator days; however, when observing complications between the two groups, it is possible that patients are more likely to have complications due to overall hospital LOS in the residents plus extenders group.

摘要

这是一项回顾性研究,旨在确定在约翰逊市医疗中心(JCMC)创伤科就诊患者的治疗结果。该研究纳入了创伤登记处的2844名患者,并评估了年龄、性别、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)、总体住院时间(LOS)、呼吸机使用天数、出院处置情况,以及仅由助理医师管理的一组与由住院医师和助理医师共同管理的另一组之间的并发症情况。两组的样本量相似(第一组 = 1446,第二组 = 1398),且两组中男性和女性的比例相同(男性 = 65%,女性 = 35%)。两组的损伤机制相似,尽管第一组跌倒的比例较高(32.9% 对 22.03%),第二组机动车碰撞(MVC)创伤的比例较高(40.41% 对 30%)。两组之间出院回家和死亡的情况没有显著差异(χ(1, N = 2258) = 0.04,p = 0.82)。在观察所有并发症时,比较助理医师与住院医师加助理医师,并发症显示出统计学意义(χ(7, N = 196) = 38.73,p ≤ 0.0001)。基于年龄、性别、ISS、ICU住院天数、总体住院LOS和呼吸机使用天数等变量,仅有助理医师与助理医师和住院医师同时存在可能在患者治疗结果方面没有显著差异;然而,当观察两组之间的并发症时,住院医师加助理医师组的患者可能由于总体住院LOS而更易出现并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9122/7153817/2a83257e44a8/cureus-0012-00000007266-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9122/7153817/2a83257e44a8/cureus-0012-00000007266-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9122/7153817/2a83257e44a8/cureus-0012-00000007266-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Outcome of Patient Management with Physician Extenders Only and with both Residents and Extenders.仅由医师助理进行患者管理与由住院医师和医师助理共同进行患者管理的结果比较。
Cureus. 2020 Mar 14;12(3):e7266. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7266.
2
Hospital outcomes and disposition of trauma patients who are intubated because of combativeness.因好斗而插管的创伤患者的医院治疗结果及处置情况
J Trauma. 2010 Jun;68(6):1305-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181dcd137.
3
Utilization of tracheostomy in craniomaxillofacial trauma at a level-1 trauma center.一级创伤中心中气管切开术在颅颌面创伤中的应用
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;65(10):2005-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.019.
4
Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage due to motor vehicle crash versus fall from height: a 4-year epidemiologic study.因机动车事故与高处坠落导致的创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血:一项为期 4 年的流行病学研究。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;82(5):e639-44. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.022. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
5
The new injury severity score is a better predictor of extended hospitalization and intensive care unit admission than the injury severity score in patients with multiple orthopaedic injuries.对于多发骨科损伤患者,新损伤严重程度评分比损伤严重程度评分更能预测延长住院时间和入住重症监护病房的情况。
J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Aug;17(7):508-12. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200308000-00006.
6
Pediatric sports-related traumatic brain injury in United States trauma centers.美国创伤中心的儿童运动相关创伤性脑损伤
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Apr;40(4):E3. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.FOCUS15612.
7
Comparison of the new Exponential Injury Severity Score with the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score in trauma patients: A cross-sectional study.新指数损伤严重度评分与损伤严重度评分及新损伤严重度评分在创伤患者中的比较:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187871. eCollection 2017.
8
"One-way-street" streamlined admission of critically ill trauma patients reduces emergency department length of stay.“单行道”式优化流程对危重症创伤患者的收治可缩短急诊科停留时间。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;12(7):1019-1024. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1511-x. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
9
Prognostication of traumatic brain injury outcomes in older trauma patients: A novel risk assessment tool based on initial cranial CT findings.老年创伤患者创伤性脑损伤预后的预测:一种基于初始头颅CT表现的新型风险评估工具。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Jan-Mar;7(1):23-31. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_2_17.
10
Value of aggressive surgical and intensive care unit in elderly patients with traumatic spinal cord injury.老年创伤性脊髓损伤患者积极的外科和重症监护病房的价值。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Mar 1;46(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2018.12.FOCUS18555.

本文引用的文献

1
An Outcome Analysis of Nurse Practitioners in Acute Care Trauma Services.急性护理创伤服务中医师助理的结果分析
J Trauma Nurs. 2017 Nov/Dec;24(6):365-370. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000327.
2
The impact of the implementation of physician assistants in inpatient care: A multicenter matched-controlled study.医师助理在住院护理中实施的影响:一项多中心配对对照研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0178212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178212. eCollection 2017.
3
Physician extenders on surgical services: a systematic review.外科服务中的医师助理:一项系统评价。
Can J Surg. 2017 Jun;60(3):172-178. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001516.
4
Nurse practitioner coverage is associated with a decrease in length of stay in a pediatric chronic ventilator dependent unit.在小儿慢性呼吸机依赖病房,执业护士的护理与住院时间的缩短相关。
World J Clin Pediatr. 2016 May 8;5(2):191-7. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i2.191.
5
Nurse practitioner/physician assistant staffing and critical care mortality.执业护士/医师助理人员配备与重症监护死亡率
Chest. 2014 Dec;146(6):1566-1573. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0566.
6
A comparison of outcomes of general medical inpatient care provided by a hospitalist-physician assistant model vs a traditional resident-based model.医院医师助理模式与传统住院医师模式提供的一般医疗住院护理结果比较。
J Hosp Med. 2011 Mar;6(3):122-30. doi: 10.1002/jhm.826.
7
Physician extenders impact trauma systems.医师助理对创伤系统产生影响。
J Trauma. 2005 May;58(5):917-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000162736.06947.e3.
8
Effect of an outcomes-managed approach to care of neuroscience patients by acute care nurse practitioners.急性护理执业护士采用结果管理方法护理神经科学患者的效果。
Am J Crit Care. 2002 Jul;11(4):353-62.