Suppr超能文献

饮酒后,黑人和白人对酒精的内隐联想存在差异。

Differences in implicit associations about alcohol between blacks and whites following alcohol administration.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Mar;72(2):270-8. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.270.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Implicit cognitions about alcohol have been shown to be an important predictor of alcohol use. Relatively little research has been conducted on racial/ethnic differences in implicit cognitions or changes in implicit cognitions while intoxicated. This study examined differences between Blacks and Whites in positive and negative implicit associations about alcohol, as measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and tested differences in IAT scores when participants were sober and intoxicated.

METHOD

One hundred thirty-five young adults (46% of Black descent) participated in an alcohol-administration study, receiving a moderate dose of alcohol (0.72 g/kg alcohol for men, 0.65 g/kg for women). The IAT was administered in two sessions, one in which alcohol was administered (30 minutes after alcohol consumption) and one in which it was not, approximately 1 week apart.

RESULTS

Repeated-measures mixed-factorial analyses of variance were conducted separately for positive and negative IAT scores. Blacks held lower positive and negative implicit cognitions about alcohol compared with Whites. Positive and negative IAT scores did not change as a function of intoxication. Positive explicit expectancies and self-reported past-month drinking behavior were related to positive IAT scores. Positive and negative IAT scores were also related to acute subjective response to alcohol, and this association differed by race.

CONCLUSIONS

Results extend previous studies by providing evidence for racial differences in implicit cognitions about alcohol and by showing the stability of the IAT while participants are intoxicated. Future studies are needed to determine what factors contribute to racial differences in implicit cognitions.

摘要

目的

研究表明,对酒精的内隐认知是预测酒精使用的一个重要因素。关于种族/民族之间内隐认知的差异以及醉酒时内隐认知的变化,相对较少的研究。本研究通过内隐联想测验(IAT),考察了黑人和白人在对酒精的积极和消极内隐联想方面的差异,并测试了参与者在清醒和醉酒时 IAT 评分的差异。

方法

135 名年轻成年人(46%为黑人血统)参与了一项酒精给药研究,接受了中等剂量的酒精(男性 0.72g/kg 酒精,女性 0.65g/kg 酒精)。IAT 在两个阶段进行,一个阶段给予酒精(在酒精摄入后 30 分钟),另一个阶段不给予酒精,大约相隔一周。

结果

对正性和负性 IAT 评分分别进行重复测量混合方差分析。与白人相比,黑人对酒精的正性和负性内隐认知较低。正性和负性 IAT 评分不因醉酒而改变。正性的外显期望和自我报告的过去一个月饮酒行为与正性 IAT 评分相关。正性和负性 IAT 评分也与急性酒精主观反应有关,这种关联因种族而异。

结论

结果提供了关于种族之间对酒精的内隐认知差异的证据,并表明参与者醉酒时 IAT 的稳定性,从而扩展了以前的研究。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些因素导致了种族之间内隐认知的差异。

相似文献

1
Differences in implicit associations about alcohol between blacks and whites following alcohol administration.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Mar;72(2):270-8. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.270.
3
Challenging implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in young heavy drinkers.
Addiction. 2005 Jun;100(6):806-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01064.x.
4
Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 Nov;111(4):648-658. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.111.4.648.
5
Implicitly positive about alcohol? Implicit positive associations predict drinking behavior.
Addict Behav. 2008 Aug;33(8):979-86. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
8
Self-control and implicit drinking identity as predictors of alcohol consumption, problems, and cravings.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Mar;75(2):290-8. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.290.
10
Change in implicit alcohol associations over time: Moderation by drinking history and gender.
Addict Behav. 2020 Aug;107:106413. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106413. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of subjective response to alcohol in Caucasian and Hispanic/Latino samples.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Oct;26(5):467-475. doi: 10.1037/pha0000212. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
2
Impulsivity moderates the relationship between implicit associations about alcohol and alcohol use.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Dec;26(4):766-72. doi: 10.1037/a0028742. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:551-75. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131444.
3
Implicit cognition and substance use: a meta-analysis.
Addict Behav. 2008 Oct;33(10):1314-28. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.06.009. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
4
Contextual influences on alcohol expectancy processes.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Sep;68(5):759-70. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.759.
5
Implicit and explicit measures of alcohol and smoking cognitions.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Dec;20(4):436-44. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.436.
6
Is the strength of implicit alcohol associations correlated with alcohol-induced heart-rate acceleration?
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006 Aug;30(8):1336-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00161.x.
7
Assessing implicit alcohol associations with the Implicit Association Test: fact or artifact?
Addict Behav. 2006 Aug;31(8):1346-62. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.10.009. Epub 2005 Dec 2.
8
Specifying race-ethnic differences in risk for psychiatric disorder in a USA national sample.
Psychol Med. 2006 Jan;36(1):57-68. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705006161. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
9
Context effects on alcohol cognitions.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Feb;29(2):196-206. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000153545.36787.c8.
10
Gender, alcohol consumption, and differing alcohol expectancy dimensions in college drinkers.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Nov;12(4):298-308. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.12.4.298.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验