Read Jennifer P, Curtin John J
Department of Psychology, Park Hall, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260-4110, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Sep;68(5):759-70. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.759.
Context may differentially influence expectancy dimensions, in turn affecting drinking behavior. The present study examined alcohol cue and mood contextual influences on expectancy activation, controlling for more stable self-reported expectancy endorsement. We were particularly interested in the specific effects of negative mood on affect-relevant (tension reduction) expectancies.
Regularly drinking undergraduates (N = 140; 64 female) underwent a mood (stress or neutral) induction procedure and then were presented with alcohol or nonalcohol beverage cues. Participants next completed a computerized expectancy response time task (ETASK), and self-report measures of drinking variables.
Individual difference analyses generally replicated previous reports on the inverse relationship between alcohol involvement and ETASK response time. However, examination of contextual effects revealed a different pattern of ETASK responding. Participants exposed to alcohol cues were slower to respond to expectancy items than those in the nonalcohol cue condition. Mood and expectancy type moderated this effect; response time after alcohol cues slowed selectively for those in the stress mood condition and only for tension-reduction expectancy items.
These data highlight the dimensionality of expectancies that comes into relief when contextual factors are considered. Expectancy response times index both facilitation, when examined in the context of drinking expertise, and interference, in response to motivationally relevant stimuli. Our data also support the specificity of contextual effects on those expectancies that are context relevant (i.e., mood). Further consideration of these contextual effects on dynamic expectancy processes may improve prediction of drinking behavior in real-world settings.
情境可能会对预期维度产生不同影响,进而影响饮酒行为。本研究考察了酒精线索和情绪情境对预期激活的影响,同时控制了更稳定的自我报告的预期认可。我们特别关注消极情绪对与情感相关(减轻紧张)预期的具体影响。
经常饮酒的大学生(N = 140;64名女性)接受了情绪(压力或中性)诱导程序,然后呈现酒精或非酒精饮料线索。参与者随后完成了一项计算机化的预期反应时间任务(ETASK)以及饮酒变量的自我报告测量。
个体差异分析总体上重复了先前关于酒精参与度与ETASK反应时间之间负相关关系的报告。然而,对情境效应的考察揭示了ETASK反应的不同模式。接触酒精线索的参与者对预期项目的反应比处于非酒精线索条件下的参与者更慢。情绪和预期类型调节了这种效应;酒精线索后的反应时间仅在压力情绪条件下对那些参与者以及仅对减轻紧张预期项目有选择性地减慢。
这些数据突出了在考虑情境因素时凸显出来的预期维度。预期反应时间既反映了在饮酒专业知识背景下的促进作用,也反映了对动机相关刺激的干扰作用。我们的数据还支持情境效应对于那些与情境相关(即情绪)的预期的特异性。进一步考虑这些情境效应在动态预期过程中的作用,可能会改善对现实世界中饮酒行为的预测。