Sharif Sumera, Zahid Imran, Routledge Tom, Scarci Marco
Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Jun;12(6):1040-5. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.256289. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is superior to supportive care in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Overall, 110 papers were found using the reported search, of which 14 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results are tabulated. We conclude that EPP confers no advantage to chemotherapy and palliative treatment in terms of survival and symptom improvement. Ten studies evaluated the role of EPP in the management of MPM. The median survival was 13 months and perioperative and 30-day mortality rates were 5.7% and 9.1%, respectively. There was a high morbidity rate of 37% including atrial fibrillation, empyema and supraventricular arrhythmias. Disease recurred in 73% of patients at a median time of 10 months. Median hospital stay was 13 days and intensive care unit stay was 1.5 days. At three months postsurgery, improvement in symptoms was achieved in 68% of patients. Significant advantages were observed in patients with epithelial MPM (19 vs. 8 months, P<0.01) compared to non-epithelial MPM and with N2 disease (19 vs. 10 months) compared to N1 or N0 disease, respectively. Two studies reported outcomes after chemotherapy in patients with MPM. The median survival was 13 months and symptoms improved in 50% of patients. Response rate of 21% was achieved and the median time to disease progression was 7.2 months. Postoperative haematological toxicity was common and included neutropenia (25%), anaemia (5%) and thrombocytopenia (7.4%). Two studies analysed palliative treatment in mesothelioma and reported a median survival of seven months and improvement in symptoms in 25% of patients at one-year post-treatment. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.8% and complications included prolonged air leak (9.8%) and empyema (4%). Median hospital stay was seven days. Overall, EPP shows no benefit in terms of survival or symptom improvement which is compounded by its high operative mortality and recurrence rate.
根据结构化方案撰写了一篇胸外科最佳证据主题文章。所探讨的问题是,在治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)患者时,胸膜外肺切除术(EPP)是否优于支持性治疗。总体而言,通过报告的检索方式共找到110篇论文,其中14篇代表了回答该临床问题的最佳证据。现将作者、期刊、出版日期和国家、所研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结局和结果制成表格。我们得出结论,在生存和症状改善方面,EPP在化疗和姑息治疗方面并无优势。十项研究评估了EPP在MPM治疗中的作用。中位生存期为13个月,围手术期死亡率和30天死亡率分别为5.7%和9.1%。发病率高达37%,包括心房颤动、脓胸和室上性心律失常。73%的患者疾病复发,中位复发时间为10个月。中位住院时间为13天,重症监护病房住院时间为1.5天。术后三个月时,68%的患者症状得到改善。与非上皮性MPM相比,上皮性MPM患者(19个月对8个月,P<0.01)以及与N1或N0期疾病相比,N2期疾病患者(19个月对10个月)分别观察到显著优势。两项研究报告了MPM患者化疗后的结局。中位生存期为13个月,50%的患者症状改善。缓解率为21%,疾病进展的中位时间为7.2个月。术后血液学毒性常见,包括中性粒细胞减少(25%)、贫血(5%)和血小板减少(7.4%)。两项研究分析了间皮瘤的姑息治疗,报告中位生存期为7个月,治疗一年后25%的患者症状改善。30天死亡率为7.8%,并发症包括持续漏气(9.8%)和脓胸(4%)。中位住院时间为7天。总体而言,EPP在生存或症状改善方面并无益处,且其高手术死亡率和复发率使其情况更为复杂。