• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸膜外全肺切除术治疗早期恶性胸膜间皮瘤:一种有害的操作。

Extrapleural pneumonectomy for early stage malignant pleural mesothelioma: a harmful procedure.

机构信息

Thoracic Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2012 Jul;77(1):151-5. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.12.009
PMID:22244608
Abstract

The effects on long-term post-operative quality of life (QoL) and disease-control in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) of extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) are compared. Seventy-seven patients affected by early-stage MPM received EPP (40) or P/D (37) associated with multimodal treatment between 1998 and 2009 at our institution. The last consecutive 39 (19 EPP and 20 P/D) were asked to answer the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline and at 6- and 12-months after treatment completion to evaluate the impact on QoL of both procedures. QoL evaluation was stopped at recurrence demonstration. Twenty-five (62%) EPP vs 9 (24%) P/D patients (p = 0.002) had in-hospital major complications, and 2/40 (5%) EPP vs no one P/D patients died after surgery. Both procedures caused a significant impairment of all the considered variables of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire after treatment completion; only P/D patients returned at baseline levels after 12 months. EPP patients had a worse long-term post-operative QoL when compared with P/D. Median post-operative disease-free period was longer for EPP patients (14 vs 11 months) whereas the residual life to death period after recurrence detection was significantly longer for P/D patients (13 vs 9 months) (p = 0.01). Median long-term survival was longer, even not significant, for P/D patients (25 vs 20 months). MPM patients submitted to EPP had a higher post-operative complication rate, a worse long-term QoL, a shorter residual life time after recurrent disease, despite a similar long-term survival when compared to P/D.

摘要

比较了胸膜外全肺切除术(EPP)和胸膜切除术/剥脱术(P/D)对恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)患者术后长期生活质量(QoL)和疾病控制的影响。1998 年至 2009 年期间,我们机构对 77 例早期 MPM 患者进行了 EPP(40 例)或 P/D(37 例)治疗,并联合了多模式治疗。最后连续 39 例(19 例 EPP 和 20 例 P/D)在基线和治疗完成后 6 个月和 12 个月时被要求回答 EORTC-QLQ-C30 问卷,以评估两种手术对 QoL 的影响。在出现复发的情况下,QoL 评估停止。25 例(62%)EPP 患者与 9 例(24%)P/D 患者(p=0.002)发生院内重大并发症,40 例 EPP 患者中有 2 例(5%)与无 P/D 患者术后死亡。两种手术在治疗完成后都会显著损害 EORTC-QLQ-C30 问卷中所有考虑的变量;只有 P/D 患者在 12 个月后恢复到基线水平。与 P/D 相比,EPP 患者的术后长期 QoL 更差。EPP 患者的无病生存期较长(14 个月 vs 11 个月),而在复发检测后死亡的剩余生存时间 P/D 患者明显更长(13 个月 vs 9 个月)(p=0.01)。即使没有统计学意义,P/D 患者的中位长期生存率也更长(25 个月 vs 20 个月)。与 P/D 相比,接受 EPP 的 MPM 患者术后并发症发生率更高,长期 QoL 更差,复发性疾病后剩余生存时间更短,但长期生存率相似。

相似文献

1
Extrapleural pneumonectomy for early stage malignant pleural mesothelioma: a harmful procedure.胸膜外全肺切除术治疗早期恶性胸膜间皮瘤:一种有害的操作。
Lung Cancer. 2012 Jul;77(1):151-5. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
2
Long-term survival after lung-sparing total pleurectomy for locally advanced (International Mesothelioma Interest Group Stage T3-T4) non-sarcomatoid malignant pleural mesothelioma.局部晚期(国际间皮瘤兴趣小组分期 T3-T4)非肉瘤样恶性胸膜间皮瘤行肺保留性全胸膜切除术的长期生存。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 May;41(5):1031-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr192. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
3
Case-control study between extrapleural pneumonectomy and radical pleurectomy/decortication for pathological N2 malignant pleural mesothelioma.胸膜外全肺切除术与根治性胸膜切除术/胸膜剥脱术治疗病理性N2期恶性胸膜间皮瘤的病例对照研究
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 May;31(5):765-70; discussion 770-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.064. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
4
Extrapleural pneumonectomy or supportive care: treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma?胸膜外肺切除术或支持治疗:恶性胸膜间皮瘤的治疗方法?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Jun;12(6):1040-5. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.256289. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
5
The role of extrapleural pneumonectomy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. A Lung Cancer Study Group trial.胸膜外全肺切除术在恶性胸膜间皮瘤中的作用。一项肺癌研究组试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Jul;102(1):1-9.
6
Extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication in the surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: results in 663 patients.胸膜外肺切除术与胸膜剥脱术/纤维板剥脱术治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的手术疗效:663例患者的结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Mar;135(3):620-6, 626.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.054. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
7
Risk factors for major complications after extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤行胸膜外肺切除术后主要并发症的危险因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;85(4):1206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.065.
8
Radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: results and prognosis.恶性胸膜间皮瘤的根治性手术:结果与预后
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Feb;7(1):102-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2007.166322. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
9
Malignant pleural mesothelioma: surgical management in 285 patients.恶性胸膜间皮瘤:285例患者的外科治疗
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1):257-64; discussion 264. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.06.066.
10
The role of video assisted thoracoscopic pleurectomy/decortication in the therapeutic management of malignant pleural mesothelioma.电视辅助胸腔镜胸膜切除术/纤维板剥脱术在恶性胸膜间皮瘤治疗管理中的作用
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Jan;33(1):83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.09.039. Epub 2007 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Pleurectomy/Decortication Versus Extrapleural Pneumonectomy in Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival, Mortality, and Surgical Trends.胸膜间皮瘤中胸膜剥脱术/纤维板剥脱术与胸膜外全肺切除术的比较:生存、死亡率及手术趋势的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 23;14(17):5964. doi: 10.3390/jcm14175964.
2
The Role of Surgery in Pleural Mesothelioma.手术在胸膜间皮瘤中的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;16(9):1719. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091719.
3
Spare the lung: surgical treatment approach for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
保留肺脏:恶性胸膜间皮瘤的外科治疗方法
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):197-199. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-909. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
4
Do we still need to debate the merits of pleurectomy/decortication extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma?对于恶性胸膜间皮瘤,我们是否仍需对胸膜切除术/胸膜剥脱术与胸膜外全肺切除术的优缺点展开辩论?
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):193-196. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-24. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
5
Contemporary issues in the surgical management of pleural mesothelioma.胸膜间皮瘤的外科治疗的当代问题。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Feb;127(2):343-354. doi: 10.1002/jso.27152.
6
Near Missed Case of Occupational Pleural Malignant Mesothelioma, a Case Report and Latest Therapeutic Options.职业性胸膜恶性间皮瘤错失病例报告及最新治疗选择
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;19(22):14763. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214763.
7
Multifactorial Evaluation following Cytoreductive Surgery for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Patients with High Symptom-Burden.高症状负担的恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者减瘤手术后的多因素评估
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 29;11(21):6418. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216418.
8
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pleurectomy/Decortication versus Extrapleural Pneumonectomy in the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.胸膜剥脱术/纤维板剥脱术与胸膜外全肺切除术治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的系统评价和Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 22;11(19):5544. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195544.
9
Meta-analysis of survival after extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) versus pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) for malignant pleural mesothelioma in the context of macroscopic complete resection (MCR).宏观完全切除(MCR)背景下,恶性胸膜间皮瘤行胸膜外全肺切除术(EPP)与胸膜切除术/剥脱术(P/D)的生存分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Dec;74(6):1827-1837. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01369-4. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
10
Multimodal Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Real-World Experience with 112 Patients.恶性胸膜间皮瘤的多模式治疗:112例患者的真实世界经验
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 30;14(9):2245. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092245.