Chernesky M A, Mahony J B
Regional Virology and Chlamydia Laboratory, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Methods Mol Med. 1999;20:33-46. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-535-2:33.
The use of cell cultures for the laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections was popularized during the 1970s and 80s (1-4). The techniques required live organisms and were restricted to specialized laboratories. During the 1980s the detection of chlamydia-specific antigens was extensively used and compared to cell culture, provided a less stringent transportation of clinical specimens. Both direct fluorescent antibodies (DFA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) systems were commercialized (5-7) and algorithms for confirming false positives were popularized (8,9). The first nucleic acid detection assay for C.trachomatis was evaluated during this time frame with comparisons to culture and antigen detection (10-14). In the early 1990s, the following amplified nucleic acid assays detecting C. trachomatis gene fragments were developed: polymerase chain reaction (PCR), ligase-chain reaction (LCR), Q-β replicase-amplified hybridization (QBRAH), transcription-mediated amplification (TMA), and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA). Extensive evaluations of PCR and LCR have shown, through discordant analysis and expansion of the reference standard for positives, that these amplified assays are 20-30% more sensitive than culture, antigen, or nonamplified nucleic-acid detection methods (15-29). This range in sensitivity (for PCR and/or LCR) is influenced by the rate of inhibitors of amplification found in clinical specimens.
20世纪70年代和80年代,细胞培养用于沙眼衣原体感染的实验室诊断开始普及(1-4)。这些技术需要活的生物体,并且仅限于专业实验室使用。20世纪80年代,沙眼衣原体特异性抗原检测得到广泛应用,与细胞培养相比,临床标本的运输要求没那么严格。直接荧光抗体(DFA)和酶免疫测定(EIA)系统都实现了商业化(5-7),确认假阳性的算法也得到了推广(8,9)。在此期间,首个针对沙眼衣原体的核酸检测方法得到评估,并与培养法和抗原检测法进行了比较(10-14)。20世纪90年代初,开发了以下用于检测沙眼衣原体基因片段的核酸扩增检测方法:聚合酶链反应(PCR)、连接酶链反应(LCR)、Q-β复制酶扩增杂交(QBRAH)、转录介导扩增(TMA)和基于核酸序列的扩增(NASBA)。对PCR和LCR的广泛评估表明,通过不一致分析和扩大阳性参考标准,这些扩增检测方法比培养法、抗原检测法或未扩增的核酸检测方法敏感20%-30%(15-29)。这种灵敏度范围(针对PCR和/或LCR)受临床标本中扩增抑制剂的比例影响。