Suppr超能文献

区分汉诺塔任务表现:精神病态倾向、冲动反应风格和模态的交互作用

Differentiating Tower of Hanoi performance: interactive effects of psychopathic tendencies, impulsive response styles, and modality.

作者信息

Salnaitis Christina L, Baker Crystal A, Holland James, Welsh Marilyn

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science and Leadership, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado 80840, USA.

出版信息

Appl Neuropsychol. 2011 Jan;18(1):37-46. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2010.523381.

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that performance on the computerized Tower of Hanoi is lower than performance on the manual Tower of Hanoi. The present study was conducted to elucidate potential factors that contribute to performance differences across modalities. Personality characteristics related to psychopathy and impulsive response styles were hypothesized to be correlates of poor performance on the computerized version of the Tower of Hanoi, which is a problem-solving task that requires working memory, planning, and inhibition. Eighty-four college students from a mid-sized university participated. Participants were grouped as low, middle, or high psychopathy based on their total scores on the Psychopathic Personality Inventory. A 2 (Modality) × 3 (Psychopathy) analysis of covariance, controlling for visuospatial working memory, yielded a significant interaction, in which the high psychopathy group did not differ in performance across modality, whereas the low and middle psychopathy groups performed more poorly on the computerized version. Subsequent analyses on reaction time and accuracy for the computerized modality indicated that a reflective, methodical approach to the computerized task was more productively utilized in the low psychopathy group, whereas the fast and accurate approach was more productively utilized in the high psychopathy group. These results suggest that individuals with elevated psychopathic tendencies within a normal population are not necessarily deficient in problem-solving performance on the Tower of Hanoi. Impulsive responding is associated with poor performance in the computerized version of the Tower of Hanoi, irrespective of psychopathic tendencies. Caution should be exercised in interpreting scores on the computerized Tower of Hanoi because the psychometric properties required for comparability with the manual version have not been sufficiently demonstrated.

摘要

先前的研究表明,计算机化河内塔任务的表现低于手动河内塔任务的表现。本研究旨在阐明导致不同模式下表现差异的潜在因素。与精神病态和冲动反应风格相关的人格特征被假设为计算机化河内塔任务表现不佳的相关因素,该任务是一项需要工作记忆、计划和抑制能力的解决问题任务。来自一所中型大学的84名大学生参与了研究。根据他们在《精神病态人格问卷》上的总分,参与者被分为低、中、高精神病态组。在控制视觉空间工作记忆的情况下,进行了一项2(模式)×3(精神病态)协方差分析,结果产生了显著的交互作用,即高精神病态组在不同模式下的表现没有差异,而低和中精神病态组在计算机化版本上的表现更差。随后对计算机化模式的反应时间和准确性进行的分析表明,低精神病态组更有效地采用了对计算机化任务的反思性、有条理的方法,而高精神病态组更有效地采用了快速准确的方法。这些结果表明,正常人群中具有较高精神病态倾向的个体在河内塔任务的解决问题表现上不一定存在缺陷。冲动反应与计算机化河内塔任务的表现不佳有关,无论其精神病态倾向如何。在解释计算机化河内塔任务的分数时应谨慎,因为与手动版本进行比较所需的心理测量特性尚未得到充分证明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验