a Department of Psychology , Washington State University , Pullman , WA , USA .
Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(8):1328-61. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2013.834971. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
Most neuropsychological assessments include at least one measure that is administered, scored, or interpreted by computers or other technologies. Despite supportive findings for these technology-based assessments, there is resistance in the field of neuropsychology to adopt additional measures that incorporate technology components. This literature review addresses the research findings of technology-based neuropsychological assessments, including computer- and virtual reality-based measures of cognitive and functional abilities. We evaluate the strengths and limitations of each approach, and examine the utility of technology-based assessments to obtain supplemental cognitive and behavioral information that may be otherwise undetected by traditional paper-and-pencil measures. We argue that the potential of technology use in neuropsychological assessment has not yet been realized, and continued adoption of new technologies could result in more comprehensive assessment of cognitive dysfunction and in turn, better informed diagnosis and treatments. Recommendations for future research are also provided.
大多数神经心理学评估至少包括一项由计算机或其他技术进行施测、评分或解释的测试。尽管这些基于技术的评估得到了支持性的研究结果,但神经心理学领域仍然抵制采用更多纳入技术组件的测试。本文献综述介绍了基于技术的神经心理学评估的研究结果,包括基于计算机和虚拟现实的认知和功能能力测试。我们评估了每种方法的优缺点,并研究了基于技术的评估在获取可能无法通过传统纸笔测试检测到的补充认知和行为信息方面的效用。我们认为,技术在神经心理学评估中的应用潜力尚未得到充分发挥,持续采用新技术可能会更全面地评估认知功能障碍,从而为诊断和治疗提供更有依据的信息。还提供了对未来研究的建议。