Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Apr;32(4):509-19. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21038.
It is generally considered that hand amputation changes primary motor cortex (M1) stump muscle representations. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies show that the corticospinal excitability of a stump muscle and its homologous muscle on the intact side is not equivalent, and that the resting level of excitability is higher in the stump muscle. Since changes in M1 stump muscle map characteristics (e.g., size and location) are identified by comparing stump and intact muscle maps, such changes might reflect between-side differences in corticospinal excitability rather than a true reorganization of the stump muscle's map. In eight above-elbow amputees we used TMS to map the M1 representation of a stump muscle and its homologous muscle on the intact side during rest and contraction. Importantly, the same relative stimulation intensity was used to construct each map; stimulation was performed at 120% of the motor threshold of each muscle (intact/amputated limb) measured in each condition (rest/active contraction). Resting motor threshold was lower in the stump muscle, but active motor thresholds did not differ. Motor-evoked potential amplitudes increased between the rest and muscle contraction conditions, but this increase was smaller for the stump muscle because its at-rest corticospinal excitability was higher than that of the intact muscle. When the between-side difference in excitability was considered no interhemispheric difference was found for map areas or for their medio-lateral locations. The present results challenge the view that after an upper limb amputation the stump representation moves laterally and occupies a larger M1 territory.
一般认为,手部截肢会改变初级运动皮层(M1)残端肌肉的代表。经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究表明,残端肌肉和对侧完整侧同名肌肉的皮质脊髓兴奋性并不相等,残端肌肉的静息兴奋性水平更高。由于 M1 残端肌肉图特征的变化(例如,大小和位置)是通过比较残端和完整肌肉图来识别的,因此这些变化可能反映了皮质脊髓兴奋性的侧间差异,而不是残端肌肉图的真正重组。在 8 名肘上截肢患者中,我们使用 TMS 在休息和收缩期间分别对残端肌肉及其对侧完整侧同名肌肉的 M1 代表区进行映射。重要的是,使用相同的相对刺激强度来构建每个图谱;在每种条件(休息/主动收缩)下,以每个肌肉(完整/截肢肢体)的运动阈值的 120%进行刺激。残端肌肉的静息运动阈值较低,但主动运动阈值没有差异。运动诱发电位振幅在休息和肌肉收缩状态之间增加,但残端肌肉的增加幅度较小,因为其静息时的皮质脊髓兴奋性高于完整肌肉。当考虑兴奋性的侧间差异时,对于地图区域或其中-外侧位置,都没有发现半球间差异。本研究结果挑战了上肢截肢后残端代表侧向移动并占据更大 M1 区域的观点。