• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先前将耐用医疗设备用作基于健康的人头费风险调整因素。

Prior use of durable medical equipment as a risk adjuster for health-based capitation.

作者信息

van Kleef Richard C, van Vliet René C J A

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam. The Netherlands.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2010;47(4):343-58. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_47.04.343.

DOI:10.5034/inquiryjrnl_47.04.343
PMID:21391458
Abstract

This paper examines a new risk adjuster for capitation payments to Dutch health plans, based on the prior use of durable medical equipment (DME). The essence is to classify users of DME in a previous year into clinically homogeneous classes and to apply the resulting classification as a risk adjuster for capitation payments in the subsequent year. We evaluate 143 DME types in terms of incentives, validity, predictive value, and measurability, resulting in 14 functional disability classes (FDCs). We conclude that FDCs can significantly improve the Dutch risk adjustment model, although possible incentives for oversupply have to be monitored.

摘要

本文研究了一种用于向荷兰健康计划进行按人头付费的新风险调整器,该调整器基于耐用医疗设备(DME)的既往使用情况。其核心是将上一年DME的使用者分类为临床同质类别,并将所得分类应用于次年按人头付费的风险调整器。我们从激励性、有效性、预测价值和可测量性方面评估了143种DME类型,得出了14个功能残疾类别(FDC)。我们得出结论,FDC可以显著改善荷兰的风险调整模型,不过必须监测可能存在的供应过剩激励因素。

相似文献

1
Prior use of durable medical equipment as a risk adjuster for health-based capitation.先前将耐用医疗设备用作基于健康的人头费风险调整因素。
Inquiry. 2010;47(4):343-58. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_47.04.343.
2
The high costs of death: should health plans get higher payments when members die?死亡的高昂成本:成员死亡时,健康保险计划是否应获得更高赔付?
Med Care. 1998 Oct;36(10):1451-60. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199810000-00003.
3
Multiyear diagnostic information from prior hospitalization as a risk-adjuster for capitation payments.将既往住院的多年诊断信息作为按人头付费的风险调整因素。
Med Care. 1996 Jun;34(6):549-61. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199606000-00005.
4
Risk-adjusted capitation based on the Diagnostic Cost Group Model: an empirical evaluation with health survey information.基于诊断成本组模型的风险调整后按人头付费:一项基于健康调查信息的实证评估
Health Serv Res. 1999 Feb;33(6):1727-44.
5
Variations in the persistence of health expenditures and the implications for the design of capitation payments in Taiwan.台湾地区医疗支出持续性的变化及其对人头费支付设计的影响。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jul;20(3):146-53. doi: 10.1177/1355819615577711. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
6
Pharmacy costs groups: a risk-adjuster for capitation payments based on the use of prescribed drugs.药房成本分组:一种基于处方药使用情况的人头费支付风险调整器。
Med Care. 1999 Aug;37(8):824-30. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199908000-00012.
7
The Pharmacy-based Cost Group model: validating and adjusting the classification of medications for chronic conditions to the Dutch situation.基于药房的成本分组模型:针对荷兰的情况验证和调整慢性病药物分类。
Health Policy. 2004 Apr;68(1):113-21. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.09.001.
8
Modeling Medicare costs of PACE (Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly) populations.模拟老年人全包式护理计划(PACE)人群的医疗保险费用。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2000 Spring;21(3):149-70.
9
Use of diagnosis-based risk adjustment models to predict individual health care expenditure under the National Health Insurance system in Taiwan.利用基于诊断的风险调整模型预测台湾国民健康保险制度下的个人医疗保健支出。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2005 Dec;104(12):883-90.
10
Development of a risk-adjusted capitation model based on principal inpatient diagnoses in Taiwan.基于台湾主要住院诊断的风险调整人头费模型的开发。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2003 Sep;102(9):637-43.

引用本文的文献

1
A framework for ex-ante evaluation of the potential effects of risk equalization and risk sharing in health insurance markets with regulated competition.一个用于对具有监管竞争的健康保险市场中风险均等化和风险分担的潜在影响进行事前评估的框架。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00540-4.
2
Risk Adjustment in Health Insurance Markets: Do Not Overlook the "Real" Healthy.健康保险市场中的风险调整:勿忽视“真正”的健康人群。
Med Care. 2024 Nov 1;62(11):767-772. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001955. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
3
Improving risk equalization with constrained regression.
用约束回归提高风险均衡性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;18(9):1137-1156. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0859-1. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
4
Can universal access and competition in long-term care insurance be combined?长期护理保险中的普遍可及性与竞争能否相结合?
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Jun;15(2):185-213. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9163-3. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
5
Overpaying morbidity adjusters in risk equalization models.在风险均等模型中过度支付发病率调整因子。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Sep;17(7):885-95. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0729-2. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
6
Improving the prediction model used in risk equalization: cost and diagnostic information from multiple prior years.改进风险均衡中使用的预测模型:来自多年的成本和诊断信息。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Mar;16(2):201-18. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0567-7. Epub 2014 Feb 12.