Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2011 Sep;41(9):964-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02487.x. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
As the clinical, electrocardiographic and laboratory presentation of Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is similar, both entities are in general only distinguishable by coronary angiography. The purpose of this study was to examine the endogenous stress response at presentation, quantified by the copeptin level, of patients with TTC and patients with AMI, as copeptin may be useful in the non-invasive differentiation between both diseases.
We compared the endogenous stress response at initial presentation, quantified by the plasma copeptin levels, in 21 consecutive patients finally diagnosed with TTC and 21 patients finally diagnosed with AMI matched for sex and time since chest pain onset.
The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and initial cardiac troponin T levels were comparable in TTC and AMI. Copeptin levels were significantly lower in patients with TTC when compared to patients with AMI (median 4·8 [interquartile range, IQR 3·5-13·5] pM vs. 25·6 [IQR 12·1-63·9] pM, P = 0·002). The accuracy for diagnosing TTC as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was significantly higher for copeptin than for cardiac troponin T (0·782 vs. 0·549, P = 0·031). The optimal cut-off value for differentiation between TTC and AMI was found at a copeptin level of 7·8 pM (sensitivity 67% at a specificity of 86%, negative predictive value 72%, positive predictive value 82%).
The endogenous stress response, quantified by a novel sensitive biomarker, seems to be different in patients with TTC and AMI. Copeptin levels may be helpful in the non-invasive differentiation between TTC and AMI.
由于 Takotsubo 心肌病(TTC)和急性心肌梗死(AMI)的临床、心电图和实验室表现相似,因此一般只能通过冠状动脉造影来区分这两种疾病。本研究旨在检查 TTC 患者和 AMI 患者发病时的内源性应激反应,通过 copeptin 水平来量化,因为 copeptin 可能有助于这两种疾病的无创鉴别。
我们比较了 21 例最终诊断为 TTC 的连续患者和 21 例最终诊断为 AMI 的患者的内源性应激反应,这些患者按性别和胸痛发作后时间匹配。
TTC 和 AMI 患者的心血管危险因素和初始心脏肌钙蛋白 T 水平相当。与 AMI 患者相比,TTC 患者的 copeptin 水平显著降低(中位数 4·8[四分位距 3·5-13·5] pM 与 25·6[四分位距 12·1-63·9] pM,P = 0·002)。以受试者工作特征曲线下面积衡量,copoptin 诊断 TTC 的准确性明显高于心脏肌钙蛋白 T(0·782 与 0·549,P = 0·031)。区分 TTC 和 AMI 的最佳 copeptin 水平截断值为 7·8 pM(灵敏度为 67%,特异性为 86%,阴性预测值为 72%,阳性预测值为 82%)。
用一种新型敏感的生物标志物量化的内源性应激反应在 TTC 和 AMI 患者中似乎不同。copoptin 水平可能有助于 TTC 和 AMI 的无创鉴别。