Lynam Antony J
Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, Bronx New York, USA.
Integr Zool. 2010 Dec;5(4):324-334. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00220.x.
A century ago, tigers (Panthera tigris Linnaeus, 1758) were so common in parts of Southeast Asia as to be considered pests, and governments sponsored their killing. Habitat loss and fragmentation, market-driven poaching and loss of prey have since led to the disappearance of Indochinese tigers from most their former range. Despite 15 years of dedicated tiger conservation funding, national estimates of Indochinese tiger subpopulations can at best only be roughly approximated. The future for the subspecies appears grim unless very focused efforts can be applied to stabilize and recover subpopulations. On a regional scale, the 2 proposed subspecies Panthera tigris corbetti and P. tigris jacksoni are effectively managed as separate conservation units. Evaluating where to place conservation efforts should consider the vulnerability (likelihood of extinction) and irreplaceability (likelihood that an area contributes uniquely to regional conservation) of tiger subpopulations. Only 1 site in Thailand supporting <200 individuals (Huai Kha Khaeng-Thung Yai) is considered low vulnerability, and is irreplaceable. Five sites in Lao, Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia are medium vulnerability and irreplaceable. Priorities at these 6 sites are to double tiger numbers within 10 years through protection and monitoring. Seven sites in Lao, Thailand and Myanmar are high vulnerability and irreplaceable, and might be recovered if government commitment to tigers, staff capacity and legal frameworks for tiger protection are established. Tigers are extremely vulnerable or even extinct in Cambodia's Eastern Plains and the site is irreplaceable for tigers because it represents the only large (>10,000 km(2) ) block of dry forest habitat available in the region. A reintroduction program is the only option to recover tigers there.
一个世纪前,老虎(Panthera tigris Linnaeus,1758)在东南亚部分地区非常常见,甚至被视为害虫,政府还曾出资捕杀它们。自那以后,栖息地丧失和破碎化、市场驱动的偷猎行为以及猎物减少,导致印支虎在其大部分原有分布范围内消失。尽管有15年专门用于老虎保护的资金投入,但对印支虎亚种群数量的全国性估计充其量也只能大致估算。除非能采取非常有针对性的措施来稳定和恢复亚种群数量,否则该亚种的未来似乎不容乐观。在区域层面,提议的两个亚种——马来亚虎(Panthera tigris corbetti)和爪哇虎(P. tigris jacksoni)被作为独立的保护单元进行有效管理。评估在何处开展保护工作时,应考虑老虎亚种群的脆弱性(灭绝可能性)和不可替代性(某一地区对区域保护做出独特贡献的可能性)。泰国仅有一个支持数量不足200只老虎的地点(怀卡肯 - 通艾)被认为脆弱性较低且不可替代。老挝、泰国和马来西亚半岛的五个地点脆弱性中等且不可替代。这六个地点的首要任务是通过保护和监测,在10年内使老虎数量翻倍。老挝、泰国和缅甸的七个地点脆弱性高且不可替代,如果能确立政府对老虎保护的承诺、工作人员能力以及老虎保护法律框架,这些地点的老虎数量或许能够恢复。在柬埔寨东部平原,老虎极度濒危甚至可能已经灭绝,该地区对老虎来说不可替代,因为它是该区域唯一一块面积超过10000平方公里的干燥森林栖息地。重新引入老虎计划是在那里恢复老虎种群的唯一选择。