Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus, P.O. Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.
Biol Psychol. 2011 May;87(2):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
Research has shown that during emotional imagery, valence and arousal each modulate the startle reflex. Here, two imagery-startle experiments required participants to attend to the startle probe as a simple reaction time cue. In experiment 1, four emotional conditions differing in valence and arousal were examined. Experiment 2, to accentuate potential valence effects, included two negative high arousal, a positive high arousal and a negative low arousal condition. Imagery effectively manipulated emotional valence and arousal, as indicated by heart rate and subjective ratings. Compared to baseline, imagery facilitated startle responses. However, valence and arousal failed to significantly affect startle magnitude in both experiments and startle latency in Experiment 1. Results suggest that emotional startle modulation is eclipsed when the probe is significant for task completion and/or cues a motor response. Findings suggest that an active, rather than defensive, response set may interfere with affective startle modulation, warranting further investigation.
研究表明,在情绪意象中,效价和唤醒度各自调节惊跳反射。在此,两个意象-惊跳实验要求参与者将惊跳探针作为简单反应时间线索来关注。在实验 1 中,检查了四个在效价和唤醒度上不同的情绪条件。实验 2 为了强调潜在的效价效应,包括两个负性高唤醒、一个正性高唤醒和一个负性低唤醒条件。意象有效地操纵了情绪的效价和唤醒度,这可以从心率和主观评分中看出。与基线相比,意象促进了惊跳反应。然而,在两个实验中,效价和唤醒度都没有显著影响惊跳幅度,在实验 1 中也没有显著影响惊跳潜伏期。结果表明,当探针对任务完成很重要且/或提示运动反应时,情绪惊跳调节会被掩盖。研究结果表明,一种积极的、而非防御性的反应模式可能会干扰情感惊跳调节,这值得进一步研究。