• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏再同步治疗无反应的临床和超声心动图预测因素。

Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2011 Mar;161(3):552-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.011
PMID:21392611
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lack of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) ranges between 30% to 40% of heart failure (HF) patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical and echocardiographic determinants of nonresponse to CRT.

METHODS

A total of 581 patients (66.4 ± 10.0 years, 77.9% male) with advanced HF scheduled for CRT implantation were included. Clinical and echocardiographic evaluations were performed at baseline and 6 months of follow-up. Nonresponse was defined as no improvement in the New York Heart Association functional class, death from worsening HF or heart transplantation, and <15% reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume.

RESULTS

At 6 months of follow-up, 254 patients (44%) did not respond to CRT. The nonresponders were more frequently male (81.9% vs 74.3%, P = .030) and had ischemic cardiomyopathy (69.7% vs 53.2%, P < .001), shorter QRS duration (150.6 ± 29.9 milliseconds vs 156.0 ± 32.5 milliseconds, P = .041), worse New York Heart Association functional class (2.8 ± 0.6 vs 2.7 ± 0.6, P = .008) and shorter 6-minute walk distance (297.9 ± 110.7 m vs 331.8 ± 112.6 m, P = .001), larger left atrial volumes (44.9 ± 16.9 mL/m(2) vs 40.9 ± 17.6 mL/m(2), P = .006), less baseline LV dyssynchrony (56.2 ± 41.3 milliseconds vs 69.1 ± 39.9 milliseconds, P < .001), and, more frequently, anterior LV lead position (12.4% vs 4.0%, P = .007). At multivariate analysis, only the ischemic etiology of HF (odds ratio [OR] 2.264, P = .005), shorter 6-minute walk distance at baseline (OR 0.998, P = .030), less baseline LV dyssynchrony (OR 0.989, P < .001), and anterior LV lead position (OR 3.713, P < .010) remained independent predictors of nonresponse to CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemic etiology of HF, shorter baseline 6-minute walk distance, less baseline LV dyssynchrony, and anterior LV lead position are independent determinants of nonresponse to CRT.

摘要

背景

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的无反应率在 30%至 40%的心力衰竭(HF)患者之间变化。本研究旨在评估 CRT 无反应的临床和超声心动图决定因素。

方法

共纳入 581 例(66.4±10.0 岁,77.9%为男性)拟行 CRT 植入的晚期 HF 患者。基线和 6 个月随访时进行临床和超声心动图评估。无反应定义为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级无改善、因 HF 恶化或心脏移植而死亡、左心室(LV)收缩末期容积减少<15%。

结果

随访 6 个月时,254 例(44%)患者对 CRT 无反应。无反应者更常为男性(81.9%比 74.3%,P=0.030),且为缺血性心肌病(69.7%比 53.2%,P<0.001)、QRS 时限更短(150.6±29.9 毫秒比 156.0±32.5 毫秒,P=0.041)、NYHA 功能分级更差(2.8±0.6 比 2.7±0.6,P=0.008)、6 分钟步行距离更短(297.9±110.7 m 比 331.8±112.6 m,P=0.001)、左心房容积更大(44.9±16.9 mL/m2 比 40.9±17.6 mL/m2,P=0.006)、LV 不同步程度更低(56.2±41.3 毫秒比 69.1±39.9 毫秒,P<0.001),且更常为前 LV 导联位置(12.4%比 4.0%,P=0.007)。多变量分析显示,HF 的缺血性病因(比值比[OR]2.264,P=0.005)、基线 6 分钟步行距离更短(OR 0.998,P=0.030)、LV 不同步程度更低(OR 0.989,P<0.001)和前 LV 导联位置(OR 3.713,P<0.010)是 CRT 无反应的独立预测因素。

结论

HF 的缺血性病因、基线 6 分钟步行距离较短、LV 不同步程度较低和前 LV 导联位置是 CRT 无反应的独立决定因素。

相似文献

1
Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗无反应的临床和超声心动图预测因素。
Am Heart J. 2011 Mar;161(3):552-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
2
Prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: value of calibrated integrated backscatter imaging.心脏再同步治疗反应预测:校准积分反向散射成像的价值。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jan;3(1):86-93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.882324. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
3
The ischemic etiology of heart failure in diabetics limits reverse left ventricular remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.糖尿病性心力衰竭的缺血性病因限制了心脏再同步治疗后左心室逆向重构。
J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Sep-Oct;23(5):365-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.04.003. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
4
Value of baseline left lateral wall postsystolic displacement assessed by M-mode to predict reverse remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy.通过M型超声评估的基线左室侧壁收缩末期位移预测心脏再同步治疗逆向重构的价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Aug 1;100(3):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.02.107. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
5
Site of latest activation in patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy: patterns of dyssynchrony among different QRS configurations and impact of heart failure etiology.适合心脏再同步治疗的患者的最新激活部位:不同 QRS 形态的失同步模式和心力衰竭病因的影响。
Am Heart J. 2011 Jun;161(6):1060-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.014. Epub 2011 May 11.
6
Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy.左心室不同步可预测心脏再同步治疗后的反应及预后。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Nov 2;44(9):1834-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.016.
7
Prevalence and characteristics of patients with clinical improvement but not significant left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗后临床改善但左心室逆向重构不明显患者的患病率和特征。
Am Heart J. 2010 Oct;160(4):737-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.016.
8
Left ventricular resynchronization is mandatory for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis in patients with echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony at baseline.左心室再同步化是心脏再同步治疗产生反应的必要条件:对基线时有左心室不同步超声心动图证据患者的分析
Circulation. 2007 Sep 25;116(13):1440-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.677005. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
9
Interaction of Left Ventricular Remodeling and Regional Dyssynchrony on Long-Term Prognosis after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.心脏再同步治疗后左心室重构与局部不同步对长期预后的相互作用
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Mar;30(3):244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
10
Presence of extensive LV remodeling limits the benefits of CRT in patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony.广泛的左心室重构限制了心脏再同步治疗对室内不同步患者的获益。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Oct;4(10):1067-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.07.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Left atrial volume index predicts response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.左心房容积指数可预测心脏再同步治疗的反应:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Jan 10;18(4):930-938. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.91511. eCollection 2022.
2
Judgement of the multidisciplinary team is an important predictor of mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy.多学科团队的判断是心脏再同步治疗后死亡率的重要预测因素。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):5275-5281. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13611. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
3
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with left bundle branch block with residual conduction.
左束支传导阻滞伴残余传导患者的心脏再同步治疗
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021 Jan-Feb;21(1):14-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
4
A novel risk model for mortality and hospitalization following cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: the alpha-score.一种用于非缺血性心肌病患者心脏再同步治疗后死亡率和住院率的新型风险模型:alpha 评分。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01460-x.
5
Comparison of triple-site ventricular pacing versus conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.收缩性心力衰竭患者三部位心室起搏与传统心脏再同步治疗的比较:一项随机和观察性研究的荟萃分析
J Arrhythm. 2017 Dec 21;34(1):55-64. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12018. eCollection 2018 Feb.
6
Predictors of Total Mortality and Echocardiographic Response for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Cohort Study.心脏再同步治疗的全因死亡率和超声心动图反应的预测因素:一项队列研究。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017 Dec;109(6):569-578. doi: 10.5935/abc.20170171. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
7
Vitamin D deficiency and functional response to CRT in heart failure patients.心力衰竭患者维生素D缺乏与对CRT的功能反应
Herz. 2019 Apr;44(2):147-154. doi: 10.1007/s00059-017-4630-x. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
8
Speckle tracking echocardiography: clinical applications in cardiac resynchronization therapy.斑点追踪超声心动图:在心脏再同步治疗中的临床应用
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):6668-76. eCollection 2015.