Division of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.024.
The information that details dental changes accompanying presurgical and postsurgical orthodontic treatment during orthognathic surgery treatment is disappointing and results in less than ideal surgical change, but it is largely derived from university clinic samples with patients treated by residents (clinical novices). In this study, we examined similar treatments performed by experienced practitioners and compared them with the novices' results.
A sample of 72 Class II subjects treated by practitioners with a mean of 26.7 years of experience was selected. Inclusion criteria were consecutively treated surgical-orthodontic patients with mandibular advancement, rigid fixation, and good-quality lateral cephalograms. Pretreatment skeletal and dental variables were compared with those from a sample treated by novices in a previous study. Presurgical and final analyses were performed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with pretreatment values as the covariate. An efficacy analyses for treatment phase and study comparisons was the final component.
The novices treated patients with significantly more severe Class II skeletal problems. For both studies, there were significant positive changes in the position of the mandible. The ANCOVA analysis showed that the experienced practitioners managed the bodily position of the maxillary incisors more effectively. The efficacy analysis showed no statistically significant differences between novices and experienced practitioners. For both novices and experienced practitioners, according to the ANB changes, nonideal incisor decompensation led to less than ideal final mandibular positions.
The dental and skeletal mean changes and efficacy analysis for both novices and experienced practitioners showed that presurgical orthodontic treatment often does not fully decompensate the incisors; this then limits the surgical outcome.
关于正颌手术治疗过程中术前和术后正畸治疗伴随的牙齿变化的信息令人失望,导致手术变化不理想,但这些信息主要来自于由住院医师(临床新手)治疗的大学诊所样本。在这项研究中,我们检查了由经验丰富的从业者进行的类似治疗,并将其结果与新手的结果进行了比较。
选择了 72 名接受有 26.7 年经验的从业者治疗的 II 类患者的样本。纳入标准为连续接受手术-正畸治疗的下颌前伸、刚性固定和高质量侧颅的患者。比较了治疗前骨骼和牙齿变量与以前一项研究中由新手治疗的样本的变量。采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)进行术前和最终分析,将预处理值作为协变量。治疗阶段和研究比较的疗效分析是最后一个组成部分。
新手治疗的患者 II 类骨骼问题明显更严重。对于两项研究,下颌的位置都有明显的积极变化。ANCOVA 分析表明,经验丰富的从业者更有效地管理上颌切牙的整体位置。疗效分析显示新手和经验丰富的从业者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。对于新手和经验丰富的从业者来说,根据 ANB 的变化,非理想的切牙补偿导致最终下颌位置不理想。
新手和经验丰富的从业者的牙齿和骨骼平均变化和疗效分析表明,术前正畸治疗通常不能完全补偿切牙;这会限制手术结果。