• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Herbst 矫治器逐步推进与下颌矢状劈开截骨术。成人安氏Ⅱ类患者的治疗效果和长期稳定性。

Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2009 Nov;79(6):1084-94. doi: 10.2319/110308-556R.1.

DOI:10.2319/110308-556R.1
PMID:19852598
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the treatment effects and long-term stability of the stepwise Herbst appliance and mandibular sagittal split osteotomy in skeletal Class II adult patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects comprised 16 patients in the Herbst group and another 16 patients in the surgery (mandibular sagittal split osteotomy) group. Lateral head films were taken before treatment (T0), after removal of the Herbst appliance/surgery (T1), after the fixed appliance treatment (T2), and 3 years after treatment (T3). All films were analyzed by standard cephalometrics and SO-analysis (analysis of changes in sagittal occlusion).

RESULTS

All Herbst and surgery patients were treated successfully to Class I occlusal relationships with normal overjet and overbite. Both groups showed a significant change in mandibular base advancement (SNB, SNPg, Pg/OLp), which resulted in a decrease in the ANB angle, the Wits appraisal, and facial convexity. However, the surgery group showed larger changes in the parameters mentioned above. In terms of long-term stability, both groups achieved stable results, and no significant difference occurred over time.

CONCLUSION

Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance therapy can be used to treat borderline skeletal Class II adult patients with long-term stability.

摘要

目的

比较步步为营式 Herbst 矫治器和下颌矢状劈开截骨术治疗成人骨骼Ⅱ类错颌的疗效及长期稳定性。

材料与方法

研究对象为 Herbst 矫治器组 16 例患者和手术(下颌矢状劈开截骨术)组 16 例患者。在治疗前(T0)、Herbst 矫治器/手术去除后(T1)、固定矫治器治疗后(T2)和治疗 3 年后(T3)拍摄侧头颅定位片。所有的头颅定位片均通过标准头影测量分析和 SO 分析(矢状咬合变化分析)进行分析。

结果

所有 Herbst 矫治器和手术患者均成功地矫正为Ⅰ类咬合关系,正常覆合覆盖。两组下颌基骨均有明显的前伸(SNB、SNPg、Pg/OLp),导致 ANB 角、Wits 评价和面凸度减小。然而,手术组在上述参数方面的变化更大。在长期稳定性方面,两组均获得了稳定的结果,且随时间推移无显著差异。

结论

步步为营式 Herbst 矫治器治疗可用于治疗具有长期稳定性的边缘性成人骨骼Ⅱ类错颌患者。

相似文献

1
Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.Herbst 矫治器逐步推进与下颌矢状劈开截骨术。成人安氏Ⅱ类患者的治疗效果和长期稳定性。
Angle Orthod. 2009 Nov;79(6):1084-94. doi: 10.2319/110308-556R.1.
2
Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.功能性矫治器与双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术治疗安氏II类患者的治疗效果及稳定性的长期比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Apr;127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.028.
3
A protocol for improved stability with Herbst appliance treatment for adults.改良 Herbst 矫治器治疗成人稳定性的方案。
Prog Orthod. 2010;11(2):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2010.09.009. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
4
Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.在进行下颌骨前伸手术之前维持深覆合。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):342-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp087. Epub 2009 Sep 7.
5
Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.评估萨巴赫通用矫治器在治疗生长发育期II类错牙合畸形中的效果。
Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2010 Winter;21(4):13-24.
6
Dental or skeletal relapse after sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery? Long-term follow-up.矢状劈开截骨术推进手术后的牙齿或骨骼复发?长期随访。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;69(11):e461-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.086. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
7
Long-term occlusal and soft-tissue profile outcomes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with fixed appliances.固定矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合的长期咬合及软组织侧貌变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.035.
8
Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.上颌和下颌联合手术后骨性III类错牙合的稳定性。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001 Fall;16(3):179-92.
9
Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.两种手术技术用于骨性II类错颌矫治的稳定性:矢状劈开下颌升支截骨术和下颌根尖下全牙槽骨截骨术。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Aug;120(2):134-43. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.113792.
10
Skeletal and dental stability of segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up.下颌前牙槽骨节段性牵张成骨的骨骼和牙齿稳定性:2 年随访研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;41(5):553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.1071. Epub 2012 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of low intensity pulsed ultrasound on mandibular condylar growth in young adult rats.低强度脉冲超声对年轻成年大鼠下颌髁突生长的影响。
Bone Rep. 2021 Sep 3;15:101122. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101122. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Effects of different surgical techniques and displacement distances on the soft tissue profile via orthodontic-orthognathic treatment of class II and class III malocclusions.不同外科手术技术及骨块移动距离对上、下颌骨二类及三类错(牙合)畸形患者正畸正颌联合治疗后面部软组织侧貌的影响
Head Face Med. 2021 Apr 14;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00264-4.
3
Twenty-year clinical experience with fixed functional appliances.
固定功能矫治器的二十年临床经验
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Mar-Apr;23(2):87-109. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.2.087-109.sar.
4
Comparison of surgical and non-surgical orthodontic treatment approaches on occlusal and cephalometric outcomes in patients with Class II Division I malocclusions.比较 II 类 1 分类错颌畸形患者的手术和非手术正畸治疗方法对咬合和头影测量结果的影响。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0171-3. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
5
Comparison of stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Functional Mandibular Advancer in Class II division 1 treatment.在安氏II类1分类错颌治疗中,使用功能性下颌前导器进行逐步推进与单步推进的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Jan;87(1):82-87. doi: 10.2319/032416-241.1. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
6
Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study.下颌后缩型和前突型面部患者接受Herbst治疗后的咬合稳定性:一项初步研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 May;77(3):160-7. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0020-x. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
7
Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.II类固定功能矫治器治疗的稳定性——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):129-39. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv009. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
8
Temporary anchorage device usage: a survey among Swiss orthodontists.临时锚固装置的使用:瑞士正畸医生的一项调查
Prog Orthod. 2014 Apr 1;15(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0029-x.
9
Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.使用Herbst矫治器治疗的成年患者面部侧貌吸引力的变化。
J Orofac Orthop. 2014 May;75(3):167-74. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0210-3. Epub 2014 May 15.