• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上颌弓宽度的相对长期变化是否会影响拔牙和非拔牙治疗的颊廊比?

Do long-term changes in relative maxillary arch width affect buccal-corridor ratios in extraction and nonextraction treatment?

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, The University of Texas/Houston Dental Branch, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.036.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.036
PMID:21392691
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Our aims were to evaluate long-term maxillary arch width changes in orthodontic patients treated with and without premolar extractions and to provide a potential link to the buccal-corridor ratios.

METHODS

Dental casts of 34 extraction and 32 nonextraction orthodontic patients with Class I malocclusions were digitized and evaluated before treatment (T1), at posttreatment (T2), and at postretention (T3). The mean postretention times for the extraction and the nonextraction groups were 5 years 2 months and 4 years 10 months, respectively. Specific arch width measurements were made on the anatomic y-axis of the casts between the most labial aspects of the anatomic dental arch immediately distal to the incisive papilla, the farthest point posteriorly of the conjunction of the third lateral and medial rugae on the midpalatal raphe and at an individually constant distance from the incisive papilla. Arch width changes were calculated and compared statistically to determine whether the dental arches were narrower after extraction treatment and at postretention.

RESULTS

All maxillary arch width measurements remained virtually stable after extraction therapy and at the postretention follow-up. Significant increases were recorded for all maxillary arch width measurements in the nonextraction group after treatment (mean changes, 1.37-2.05 mm). Posterior arch width measurements decreased significantly between T2 and T3 (mean change, 0.5 mm). Mean changes between T1 and T2 were significant between the 2 groups for all measurements (P <0.05). Only the mean change in posterior arch width was significant between the 2 groups in the postretention period (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Extraction treatment did not result in narrower maxillary dental arches, whereas nonextraction treatment slightly expanded the dental arch.

摘要

引言

我们的目的是评估接受和不接受前磨牙拔牙的正畸患者的上颌弓宽度的长期变化,并为颊廊比提供潜在的联系。

方法

对 34 例拔牙和 32 例非拔牙正畸患者的牙模进行数字化处理,在治疗前(T1)、治疗后(T2)和保持后(T3)进行评估。拔牙组和非拔牙组的平均保持时间分别为 5 年 2 个月和 4 年 10 个月。在牙模的解剖 Y 轴上,在切牙乳头最唇侧的解剖牙弓之间,在中切牙切迹处的第三外侧和内侧皱襞的结合部的最远处,以及距切牙乳头的个体恒定距离处,进行特定的弓宽测量。计算弓宽变化并进行统计学比较,以确定拔牙治疗后和保持后牙弓是否变窄。

结果

所有上颌弓宽度测量值在拔牙治疗后和保持后随访期间基本保持稳定。非拔牙组治疗后所有上颌弓宽度测量值均显著增加(平均变化 1.37-2.05 毫米)。治疗后 T2 至 T3 时,后弓宽度测量值显著减小(平均变化 0.5 毫米)。两组之间 T1 至 T2 之间的所有测量值的平均变化均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。仅在保持期间,两组之间的后弓宽度的平均变化具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

拔牙治疗并未导致上颌牙弓变窄,而非拔牙治疗则略微扩大了牙弓。

相似文献

1
Do long-term changes in relative maxillary arch width affect buccal-corridor ratios in extraction and nonextraction treatment?上颌弓宽度的相对长期变化是否会影响拔牙和非拔牙治疗的颊廊比?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.036.
2
Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 1: differences between premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment outcomes.上颌弓宽度和颊廊变化与正畸治疗相关。第 1 部分:磨牙拔除与不拔除治疗结果的差异。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):207-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.017.
3
Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.I类患者拔牙矫治与非拔牙矫治中的牙弓宽度变化
Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):948-52. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[948:AWCIEA]2.0.CO;2.
4
Effects of premolar extractions on Bolton overall ratios and tooth-size discrepancies in a Japanese orthodontic population.前磨牙拔除对日本错颌畸形患者 Bolton 全面比率和牙量不调的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.026.
5
Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.不同错牙合畸形患者牙弓变化的比较。
Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;25(5):623-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.147109.
6
Stability and relapse of maxillary anterior crowding treatment in class I and class II Division 1 malocclusions.安氏Ⅰ类和安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错(牙合)上颌前牙拥挤矫治的稳定性和复发。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jun;139(6):768-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.044.
7
Extraction vs nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics.拔牙矫治与不拔牙矫治:牙弓宽度与微笑美学
Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):354-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0354:EVNAWA>2.0.CO;2.
8
Effects on the dental arch form using a preadjusted appliance with premolar extraction in Class I crowding.使用预调矫治器拔除前磨牙对I类牙列拥挤患者牙弓形态的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2008 Nov;78(6):1043-9. doi: 10.2319/062707-296.1.
9
Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.拔牙与不拔牙治疗对安氏I类和II类患者的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2003 Feb;73(1):36-42. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0036:EOEANT>2.0.CO;2.
10
Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.上颌弓宽度和颊廊变化与正畸治疗相关。第 2 部分:拔牙和不拔牙治疗结果的正面微笑吸引力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Mar;145(3):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert consensus on orthodontic treatment of protrusive facial deformities.突面畸形正畸治疗专家共识
Int J Oral Sci. 2025 Feb 1;17(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00338-4.
2
Changes in the arch width and buccal corridor after fixed orthodontic treatment with Damon self-ligating system: premolar extraction vs. non-extraction.Damon 自锁托槽系统固定正畸治疗后牙弓宽度和颊廊的变化:拔牙与非拔牙。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Jul 8;29(3):e2423159. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.3.e2423159.oar. eCollection 2024.
3
Smile esthetics: Evaluation of long-term changes in the transverse dimension.
微笑美学:横向维度长期变化的评估。
Korean J Orthod. 2017 Mar;47(2):100-107. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.100. Epub 2017 Jan 25.