• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

力平台的非线性再校准。

Non-linear re-calibration of force platforms.

机构信息

Department of Electronics, Computer Science and Systems, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2011 Apr;33(4):724-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.008
PMID:21392999
Abstract

Force platforms (FPs) are used in human movement analysis to measure the ground reaction force and the center of pressure (COP), and calculate derived kinetic and energetic quantities. We propose a re-calibration method that compensates for the FP non-linearity induced by top plate bending under loading. The method develops a previous solution that was proposed for a linear re-calibration and proved suitable for both local and global error compensation (Cedraro et al., 2008). The new method was experimentally tested on 4 commercial FPs by estimating the non-linear re-calibration matrix in a first training trial and by using it to assess the three force components and the COP in a validation trial, comparing the new method to the previously proposed solution for global, linear re-calibration. The average COP accuracy (mm) in the training trial was (mean±std): 2.3±1.4, 2.6±1.5, 11.8±4.3, 14.0±2.5 for the 4 FPs before re-calibration, and 0.7±0.4, 0.6±0.2, 0.5±0.2, 2.3±1.3 after non-linear re-calibration. In the validation trial, for one of the 4 tested FPs, mean errors for the three force components (N) and COP (mm) were: 3.6±2.3 (F(X)), 3.0±0.7 (F(Y)), 5.0±2.5 (F(Z)), 1.2±0.68 (COP) after linear re-calibration, and 2.5±0.7 (F(X)), 2.6±0.5 (F(Y)), 3.9±1.2 (F(Z)), 0.6±0.3 (COP) after non-linear re-calibration. The proposed global, non-linear method performed equally well as the local, linear re-calibration method, proving well-suited to compensate for the mild non-linear behavior of FP with the advantage of estimating a single re-calibration matrix.

摘要

力平台(FPs)用于人体运动分析,以测量地面反作用力和压力中心(COP),并计算得出的运动学和能量学参数。我们提出了一种重新校准方法,补偿加载下上板弯曲引起的 FP 非线性。该方法扩展了先前提出的线性重新校准解决方案,并被证明适用于局部和全局误差补偿(Cedraro 等人,2008 年)。新方法通过在第一个训练试验中估计非线性重新校准矩阵,并在验证试验中使用它评估三个力分量和 COP,从而在 4 个商用 FP 上进行了实验测试,将新方法与先前提出的用于全局线性重新校准的方法进行了比较。在训练试验中,新方法的平均 COP 精度(mm)为(平均值±标准差):4 个 FP 在重新校准前分别为 2.3±1.4、2.6±1.5、11.8±4.3、14.0±2.5,重新校准后分别为 0.7±0.4、0.6±0.2、0.5±0.2、2.3±1.3。在验证试验中,对于 4 个测试的 FP 之一,三个力分量(N)和 COP(mm)的平均误差为:线性重新校准后分别为 3.6±2.3(F(X))、3.0±0.7(F(Y))、5.0±2.5(F(Z))、1.2±0.68(COP),非线性重新校准后分别为 2.5±0.7(F(X))、2.6±0.5(F(Y))、3.9±1.2(F(Z))、0.6±0.3(COP)。提出的全局非线性方法与局部线性重新校准方法表现相当,证明非常适合补偿 FP 的轻度非线性行为,并且具有估计单个重新校准矩阵的优势。

相似文献

1
Non-linear re-calibration of force platforms.力平台的非线性再校准。
Gait Posture. 2011 Apr;33(4):724-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
2
A portable system for in-situ re-calibration of force platforms: theoretical validation.一种用于力平台原位重新校准的便携式系统:理论验证
Gait Posture. 2008 Oct;28(3):488-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 May 2.
3
A new device for in situ static and dynamic calibration of force platforms.一种用于力平台原位静态和动态校准的新装置。
Gait Posture. 2011 Apr;33(4):701-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
4
A portable system for in-situ re-calibration of force platforms: experimental validation.一种用于力平台现场重新校准的便携式系统:实验验证
Gait Posture. 2009 Apr;29(3):449-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.11.004. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
5
A force plate based method for the calibration of force/torque sensors.基于力/力矩传感器标定的力板方法。
J Biomech. 2012 Apr 30;45(7):1332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.024. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
6
Calibration of measured center of pressure of a new stairway design for kinetic analysis of stair climbing.用于爬楼梯动力学分析的新型楼梯设计的测量压力中心校准。
J Biomech. 1996 Dec;29(12):1625-8.
7
A novel design for an instrumented stairway.一种用于仪器化楼梯的新颖设计。
J Biomech. 2007;40(3):702-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.020. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
8
A method for estimating subject-specific body segment inertial parameters in human movement analysis.一种用于估计人体运动分析中个体身体段惯性参数的方法。
Gait Posture. 2011 Apr;33(4):695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
9
Introducing a new staircase design to quantify healthy knee function during stair ascent and descent.引入一种新的楼梯设计,以量化上下楼梯过程中健康膝关节的功能。
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2010 Jun;13(3):371-8. doi: 10.1080/10255840903251296.
10
Inertially compensated force plate: a means for quantifying subject's ground reaction forces in non-inertial conditions.惯性补偿测力板:一种在非惯性条件下量化受试者地面反作用力的方法。
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2000;36:397-402.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Tool for Comprehensive Balance Assessment Based on Artificial Intelligence and Anomaly Detection.基于人工智能和异常检测的综合平衡评估工具的开发
Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 10;15(4):632. doi: 10.3390/life15040632.
2
Agreement of Three Posturographic Force Plates in the Assessment of Postural Stability.三种足底压力测力板在评估姿势稳定性方面的一致性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 4;17(9):3188. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093188.
3
Methodological factors affecting joint moments estimation in clinical gait analysis: a systematic review.
影响临床步态分析中关节力矩估计的方法学因素:一项系统综述
Biomed Eng Online. 2017 Aug 18;16(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12938-017-0396-x.
4
A public data set of human balance evaluations.一个人类平衡评估的公共数据集。
PeerJ. 2016 Nov 2;4:e2648. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2648. eCollection 2016.