Second Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara.
Second Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara.
Chest. 2011 Jul;140(1):54-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1082. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
Mixed apneas share both central and obstructive components and are often treated as if they are obstructive events. The hypothesis is that patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) who exhibit a majority of mixed apneas will differ in ventilatory control from those with predominantly obstructive apneas during wakefulness; moreover, this difference could affect nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence.
In a retrospectively derived case-control study, 5 min of respiratory inductance plethysmography signals during wakefulness prior to sleep onset were extracted from a diagnostic polysomnogram in these groups: (1) mixed apnea-dominant OSAS (mix-OSAS) (n = 36), (2) obstructive apnea-dominant OSAS (pure-OSAS) (n = 20), (3) central apnea-dominant sleep apnea syndrome (pure-CSAS) (n = 6), and (4) control subjects (n = 10). Breathing patterning was compared between the groups using the coefficient of variation (CV) for breath-to-breath inspiration time (TI), expiration time (TE), TI + TE (Ttot), and tidal volume, and an information theory-based metric of signal pattern variability (sample entropy). Subsequent CPAP adherence over 12 months was determined in OSAS groups.
Breath-to-breath CV parameters and sample entropy in the mix-OSAS group were significantly greater as compared with the pure-OSAS and control groups. In a subanalysis, CV and sample entropy were similar in the mix-OSAS and the pure-CSAS groups. CPAP adherence was significantly poorer in mix-OSAS compared with pure-OSAS.
During wakefulness, both breath patterning and sample entropy in mix-OSAS are similar to pure-CSAS and more variable than in pure-OSAS. In addition, CPAP adherence was decreased in patients with mix-OSAS, which may be related to basic differences in respiratory control.
混合性呼吸暂停既有中枢性成分,也有阻塞性成分,通常被视为阻塞性事件进行治疗。假设在清醒状态下,表现出多数混合性呼吸暂停的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)患者在通气控制方面与主要表现为阻塞性呼吸暂停的患者不同;此外,这种差异可能会影响鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的顺应性。
在一项回顾性病例对照研究中,从这些组的诊断性多导睡眠图中提取睡眠起始前清醒状态下的呼吸感应体积描记信号 5 分钟:(1)以混合性呼吸暂停为主的 OSAS(mix-OSAS)(n = 36),(2)以阻塞性呼吸暂停为主的 OSAS(纯 OSAS)(n = 20),(3)以中枢性呼吸暂停为主的睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(纯 CSAS)(n = 6),和(4)对照组(n = 10)。使用呼吸时间(TI)、呼气时间(TE)、TI+TE(Ttot)和潮气量的逐次呼吸变异性系数(CV)以及基于信息理论的信号变异性度量(样本熵)比较组间的呼吸模式。随后确定 OSAS 组在 12 个月内的 CPAP 顺应性。
与纯 OSAS 和对照组相比,mix-OSAS 组的逐次呼吸 CV 参数和样本熵显著更大。在亚分析中,mix-OSAS 组和纯 CSAS 组的 CV 和样本熵相似。与纯 OSAS 相比,mix-OSAS 的 CPAP 顺应性明显较差。
在清醒状态下,mix-OSAS 的呼吸模式和样本熵既与纯 CSAS 相似,又比纯 OSAS 更具变异性。此外,混合性呼吸暂停患者的 CPAP 顺应性降低,这可能与呼吸控制的基本差异有关。