Milvidaitė Irena, Kulakienė Ilona, Jurkienė Nemira, Linonienė Leonarda, Gugienė Laima, Kanaporienė Janina, Lukšienė Dalia, Navickas Ramūnas
Institute of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Suki-lėlių 17, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2010;46(10):664-8.
To determine informativity of clinical variables in predicting significant coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain and normal stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
This study was a retrospective analysis of data of coronary angiography performed in 84 patients with chest pain and normal stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy during 2000-2007. Single-photon emission computed tomography was performed following a one-day protocol (stress-rest). A 5-point (0-4) scoring system in a 20-segment model was used for interpretation of results. Myocardial perfusion was considered normal if the sum of stress scores was 0 to 3.
High pretest probability and informative exercise-terminating criteria were documented in 25% and 45.2% of patients, respectively. Significant coronary artery disease (stenosis ≥ 75%) was determined in 26 (31%) patients with normal myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: 15 (17.9%) patients had coronary artery disease of a single vessel, 5 (6%) of two vessels, and 6 (7.1%) of three vessels. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with typical angina and high pretest probability were more likely to have significant stenosis of one to three arteries (odds ratios, 3.8; P=0.008 and 3.43; P=0.023, respectively). Three-vessel disease was more often documented in patients with typical angina (odds ratio, 11.2; P=0.009), high pretest probability (odds ratio, 7.93; P=0.018), and signs of ischemia during exercise test (odds ratio, 6.4; P=0.037).
Patients with typical angina, high pretest probability, and signs of ischemia during exercise test have an increased probability of having significant coronary artery disease despite normal stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy; therefore, this group of patients should undergo coronary angiography.
确定胸痛且静息心肌灌注显像正常的患者中临床变量对预测显著冠状动脉疾病的信息价值。
本研究是对2000年至2007年间84例胸痛且静息心肌灌注显像正常患者的冠状动脉造影数据进行的回顾性分析。采用一日方案(负荷-静息)进行单光子发射计算机断层扫描。在20节段模型中使用5分制(0-4分)评分系统来解释结果。如果负荷评分总和为0至3分,则认为心肌灌注正常。
分别有25%和45.2%的患者记录有高预检概率和有意义的运动终止标准。在心肌灌注显像正常的26例(31%)患者中确定有显著冠状动脉疾病(狭窄≥75%):15例(17.9%)患者为单支血管冠状动脉疾病,5例(6%)为两支血管,6例(7.1%)为三支血管。单因素逻辑回归分析显示,典型心绞痛且预检概率高的患者更有可能出现一至三支动脉的显著狭窄(优势比分别为3.8;P=0.008和3.43;P=0.023)。三支血管疾病在典型心绞痛患者(优势比,11.2;P=0.009)、预检概率高的患者(优势比,7.93;P=0.018)以及运动试验中有缺血迹象的患者(优势比,6.4;P=0.037)中更常出现。
尽管静息心肌灌注显像正常,但典型心绞痛、预检概率高且运动试验中有缺血迹象的患者发生显著冠状动脉疾病的概率增加;因此,这组患者应接受冠状动脉造影检查。