Qayyum Abbas Ali, Kühl Jørgen Tobias, Kjaer Andreas, Hasbak Philip, Kofoed Klaus Fuglsang, Kastrup Jens
Department of Cardiology & Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory 2014, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen and Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen and Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017 Sep;37(5):481-488. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12322. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
Computed tomography (CT) is a novel method for assessment of myocardial perfusion and has not yet been compared to rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (PET). We aimed to compare CT measured semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion with absolute quantified myocardial perfusion using PET and to detect stenotic territories in patients with severe coronary artery disease.
Eighteen patients with stenosis narrowing coronary arteries ≥70% demonstrated on invasive coronary angiography underwent rest and adenosine stress imaging obtained by 320-multidetector CT scanner and CT/PET 64-slice scanner. CT measured myocardial attenuation density (AD) and perfusion index (PI) were correlated to absolute PET myocardial perfusion values.
Rest AD, rest and stress PI did not correlate to PET findings (r = 0·412, P = 0·113; r = 0·300, P = 0·259; and r = 0·508, P = 0·064, respectively). However, there was a significant correlation between stress AD and stress PET values (r = 0·670, P = 0·009) and between stress and rest differences for AD and PI with PET differences (r = 0·620, P = 0·006; and r = 0·639, P = 0·004, respectively). Furthermore, significant differences were observed between remote and stenotic territories for rest and stress AD (48 ± 14HU and 37 ± 16HU, P = 0·002; 76 ± 19HU and 58 ± 13HU, P<0·001, respectively), PI (9·6 ± 2·9 and 7·5 ± 3·1, P = 0·002; 21·6 ± 4·1 and 16·9 ± 3·9, P<0·001, respectively) and PET (0·96 ± 0·37 ml g min and 0·86 ± 0·26 ml g min , P = 0·036; 2·07 ± 0·76 ml g min and 1·61 ± 0·76 ml g min , P = 0·006, respectively).
Semi-quantitative CT parameters may be useful in the detection of myocardium subtended by stenotic coronary arteries.
计算机断层扫描(CT)是一种评估心肌灌注的新方法,尚未与铷-82正电子发射断层扫描(PET)进行比较。我们旨在比较CT测量的半定量心肌灌注与PET绝对定量心肌灌注,并检测严重冠状动脉疾病患者的狭窄区域。
18例经有创冠状动脉造影显示冠状动脉狭窄≥70%的患者,接受了320排多探测器CT扫描仪和CT/PET 64排扫描仪进行的静息和腺苷负荷成像。CT测量的心肌衰减密度(AD)和灌注指数(PI)与PET心肌灌注绝对值相关。
静息AD、静息和负荷PI与PET结果无相关性(r分别为0.412,P=0.113;r为0.300,P=0.259;r为0.508,P=0.064)。然而,负荷AD与负荷PET值之间存在显著相关性(r=0.670,P=0.009),AD和PI的负荷与静息差值与PET差值之间也存在显著相关性(r分别为0.620,P=0.006;r为0.639,P=0.004)。此外,在静息和负荷状态下,梗死周边区与狭窄区域的AD(分别为48±14HU和37±16HU,P=0.002;76±19HU和58±13HU,P<0.001)、PI(分别为9.6±2.9和7.5±3.1,P=0.002;21.6±4.1和16.9±3.9,P<0.001)和PET(分别为0.96±0.37ml·g-1·min-1和0.86±0.26ml·g-1·min-1,P=0.036;2.07±0.76ml·g-1·min-1和1.61±0.76ml·g-1·min-1,P=0.006)存在显著差异。
半定量CT参数可能有助于检测冠状动脉狭窄所累及的心肌。